Evaluation of the Implementation of Daily Cash Fees in Regions after the Implementation of Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 53 of 2023 (A Case Study)
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine and assess how Daily Cash Fees have been implemented in the various regions following the promulgation of Presidential Decree Number 53 of 2023. A qualitative research design is employed in this study. The study was conducted in Indonesia's East Kalimantan Province's Mahakam Ulu Regency. The study was conducted in 2024 between September and November. Through important individuals, primary and secondary data were gathered. Purposively, the key individual is identified. In-depth interviews, observation, and a review of the literature were used to gather data. According to Miles and Huberman, qualitative analysis is used in data analysis. Effectiveness, efficiency, sufficiency, alignment, responsiveness, and accuracy are the criteria used to assess the implementation of Presidential Regulation Number 53 of 2023. Following the adoption of Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 53 of 2023, the policies pertaining to the implementation of daily cash fees in various regions have not proven to be effective. The efficiency of policies regarding the implementation of daily cash fees in regions after the enactment of Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 53 of 2023 is not yet efficient. The adequacy of the implementation of this regulation is not sufficient. Policies regarding the implementation of daily fees in regions after the enactment of this regulation are uneven or inappropriate. When it comes to putting this policy into practice, employees both ASN and non-ASN—are less responsive. Without modifications that take local circumstances into consideration, Presidential Decree No. 53 of 2023 is improper. The following are some suggestions that can be made: This presidential decree should be regularly reviewed to determine whether it has been fair to all Indonesian regions. This will allow the central government to allow regional governments, like Mahakam Ulu Regency, to control the amount of money that is spent each day based on the findings of their research.
References
2. Ahmad, I. N., & Arif, L. (2023). Evaluasi Kebijakan Pengelolaan Sampah di Kabupaten Bangkalan. Jurnal Ilmiah Riset Dan Pengembangan |, 8(6), 1–15. https://ejournal.irpia.or.id/index.php/irpia-jurnal/article/view/217
3. Alexandri, M. B. (2020). Evaluasi Kebijakan Program Keluarga Harapan di Kecamatan Cakung Jakarta Timur Tahun 2019. Jurnal Moderat, 6(2), 237–244. https://jurnal.unigal.ac.id/index.php/moderat/article/view/3275
4. Amanda, R., & Henny, D. (2022). Analisis Penerapan Standar Harga Satuan Pada Penyusunan Anggaran Pendapatan Dan Belanja Daerah (Studi Kasus Pada Pemerintah Provinsi DKI Jakarta). Jurnal Ekonomi Trisakti, 2(2), 1629–1640. https://doi.org/10.25105/jet.v2i2.14934
5. Andari, R. N. (2017). Evaluation Policy of Carrying Out of Sexual Violence Crimes of Children (In Indonesian). Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 11(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2017.V11.1-11
6. Creswell, J. (2009). Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
7. Dasril, M. (2017). Evaluasi Dampak Implementasi Kebijakan Publik (Studi Tentang Evaluasi Kebijakan Peraturan Daerah Kota Palu Nomor 6 Tahun 2012 Tentang Penertiban Ternak). Jurnal Dialektika, 2(1), 67–89.
8. Dunn, W. N. (2003). Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction (in Indonesian) (Second Edition). Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
9. Hasyim, M. (2021). Prinsip Otonomi Dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah Pasca Berlakunya Peraturan Presiden Nomor 33 Tahun 2020 Tentang Standar Harga Satuan Regional. Mimbar Keadilan, 14(1), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.30996/mk.v14i1.4665
10. Indonesia, M. H. D. H. A. M. R. (2019). Peraturan Pemerintahntah Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 20l9 Tentang Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah. https://doi.org/10.1093/oed/9600622025
11. Kristian, I. (2021). Evaluasi Kebijakan Penataan Pedagang Kaki Lima (Pkl) Di Jalan Kiara Condong Kota Bandung. Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 19(2), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.54783/dialektika.v19i2.4
12. Mayangkara, A. P. (2016). Evaluasi Kebijakan Pengelolaan Sampah di TPA Gunung Panggung Kabupaten Tuban. JPAP: Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik, 2(2), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.30996/jpap.v2i02.1001
13. Menteri Sekretaris Negara Republik Indonesia. (2023). Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 53 Tahun 2023 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Presiden Nomor 33 Tahun 2020 Tentang Standar Harga Satuan Regional. In Presiden Republik Indonesia. www.peraturan.go.id
14. Nahdiyyah, I. R. (2023). Evaluasi Kebijakan Bantuan Siswa Miskin Melalui Program Kartu Indonesia Pintar ( KIP ) ( Studi Kasus Di SMA Negeri 4 Kota Cirebon ). INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(5), 7300–7312.
15. Nalle, F. W., Oki, K. K., & Sangaji, P. M. M. (2021). Analysis of regional financial capacity in the context of implementing regional autonomy in the province of East Nusa Tenggara. Inovasi, 17(1), 184–197.
16. Pristika, B., & Kurniawan, B. (2021). Evaluasi Kebijakan Penataan Pedagang Kaki Lima di Jawa Timur. Publika, 9(2), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.26740/publika.v9n2.p241-254
17. Saka, C. L. (2023). Evaluasi Kebijakan Pengawasan dan Pengendalian Minuman Beralkohol di Kabupaten Sikka Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Bhakti Praja, 10(1), 240–259.
18. Situmorang, C. H. (2016). Kebijakan Publik (Teori, Analisis, Implementasi dan Evaluasi Kebijakan). Yogyakarta: CV. The Journal Publishing.
19. Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.
20. Sumada, I. M., & Suradika, A. (2020). Evaluasi Kebijakan Penerbitan Tanda Daftar Usaha Pariwisata Di Badan Pelayanan Dan Perizinan Terpadu Kabupaten Badung. Public Inspiration: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 5(1), 16–27. https://www.ejournal.warmadewa.ac.id/index.php/public-inspiration/article/view/1553%0Ahttps://www.ejournal.warmadewa.ac.id/index.php/public-inspiration/article/download/1553/1472
21. Walter, D. J. P., Azijah, D. N., & Aditya, I. (2024). Evaluasi Kebijakan Pemerintah Dalam Pengelolaan Fasilitas Olahraga Milik Pemerintah di Kabupaten Karawang (Studi Kasus Gor Panatayudha dan Sport Hall Adiarsa). Communnity Development Journal, 5(1), 1007–1021.
22. Waru, A. P. D. T., Janah, Y., Susanti, I. D., & Yanti, S. R. (2020). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Publik Terhadap Kepuasan Masyarakat Dalam Kepemilikan Ktp Elektronik Pada Kelurahan Cempaka Baru. Jurnal AKRAB JUARA, 5(2), 85–96.
23. Wibawa, S. (1994). Kebijakan Publik :Proses dan Analisis. Jakarta: Intermedia.
24. Winarno, B. (2004). Kebijakan Publik Teori dan Proses. Jakarta: PT. Buku Kita.
25. Winarta, I. W. T., Raka, A. A. G., & Sumada, I. M. (2020). Evaluasi Kebijakan Penyaluran Dana Bantuan Sosial di Pemerintah Kabupaten Gianyar. Public Inspiration: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 5(1), 28–42.
26. Yanti, N. N. K. (2022). Evaluasi Kebijakan WFH Terhadap Pelayanan Publik Di Indonesia. Journal Widyanata, 19(2),67–75. https://ojs.unr.ac.id/index.php/widyanata/article/view/999
Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.