Abstract

The study understands criminality as a progression along a continuum; this is different from the often-held perspective that criminality is an individual trait or choice. In this way, the current study takes information obtained from systematic reviews of empirical criminological studies from 2000 to 2020 and synthesizes contemporary theoretical insights about how criminal behaviour emerges, persists and ceases through social interactions between structural conditions and institutional responses over time through three core research questions using the PRISMA framework. As a result of this systematic review, there is substantial agreement on five theoretical perspectives that dominate contemporary criminological research: General Strain Theory, Social Learning Theory, Social Control Theory, Labelling Theory and Life Course Criminology. Although many studies are framed within one theoretical perspective, the majority of studies combine multiple theoretical perspectives, reflecting a growing recognition that criminality is cumulative and relational in nature and exists in relation to social environments throughout the life course. Methodologically, the literature predominantly utilises longitudinal designs, self-report surveys and administrative data and focuses on social interactions, institutional contacts and developmental trajectories. In conclusion, the review presents a pronounced shift in criminological research away from individualistic and descriptive explanatory models in favour of process-oriented explanatory models that will continue to shape theoretical development in future criminological research.

Keywords

  • Criminality
  • Social Process
  • Systematic Review
  • Criminological Theory
  • Qualitative Synthesis

References

  1. Agnew, R. (2001). Building on the foundation of General Strain Theory: Specifying the types of strain most likely to lead to crime and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38(4),319–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427801038004001
  2. Agnew, R. (2006). Pressured into crime: An overview of General Strain Theory. Criminology, 44(2), 319–361. ( ihave make a introduction part. if you can develop it it will be a big help) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00064.x
  3. Akers, R. L. (2009). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Criminology, 47(3), 653–689. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00160.x
  4. Bernburg, J. G. (2009). Labelling theory. Crime and Justice, 38(1), 179–247. https://doi.org/10.1086/599071
  5. Cullen, F. T. (2011). Beyond adolescence-limited criminology: Choosing our futureβ€”the American Society of Criminology 2010 Sutherland Address. Criminology, 49(2), 287–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00218.x
  6. Giordano, P. C. (2020). Continuing education: Toward a life-course perspective on social learning. Criminology, 58(2), 199–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12244
  7. Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., & Rudolph, J. L. (2002). Gender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107(4), 990–1064. https://doi.org/10.1086/343191
  8. Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2003). Understanding desistance from crime. Crime and Justice, 28, 1–69. https://doi.org/10.1086/652208
  9. Matsueda, R. L. (2006). Differential social organization, collective action, and crime. Crime, Law and Social Change, 46(1–2), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-006-9023-7
  10. Pager, D. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108(5), 937–975.https://doi.org/10.1086/374403
  11. Sampson, R. J. (2012). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. University of Chicago Press.
  12. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (2005). A life-course view of the development of crime. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 602(1), 12–45.https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716205280075
  13. Warr, M. (2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. Criminology, 40(4), 949–975.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2002.tb00980.x
  14. Piquero, A. R. (2023). β€œWe study the past to understand the present; we understand the present to guide the future”: The time capsule of developmental and life-course criminology. Journal of Criminal Justice, 85, 101932.
  15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101932
  16. Bernburg, J. G., Krohn, M. D., & Rivera, C. J. (2006). Official labeling, criminal embeddedness, and subsequent delinquency: A longitudinal test of labeling theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43(1), 67–88.
  17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427805280068
  18. Chiricos, T., Barrick, K., Bales, W., & Bontrager, S. (2007). The labeling of convicted felons and its consequences for recidivism. Criminology, 45(3), 547–581.
  19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00089.x
  20. Retrocagno, C. (2020). Retrofitting social learning theory with contemporary understandings of learning and memory derived from cognitive psychology and neuroscience. Journal of Criminal Justice, 66, 101655.
  21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2019.101655
  22. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (2005). A life-course view of the development of crime. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 602(1), 12–45.
  23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716205280075
  24. Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2018). Understanding desistance from crime. Crime and Justice, 47(1), 1–51.
  25. https://doi.org/10.1086/696030
  26. Costello, B. J., & Laub, J. H. (2020). Social control theory: The legacy of Travis Hirschi’s Causes of Delinquency. Annual Review of Criminology, 3, 21–41.
  27. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011419-041527
  28. Warr, M. (2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. Criminology, 40(4), 949–975.
  29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2002.tb00980.x
  30. Matsueda, R. L., Kreager, D. A., & Huizinga, D. (2006). Deterring delinquency: A rational choice model of theft and violence. American Sociological Review, 71(1), 95–122.
  31. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100105
  32. Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., & Rudolph, J. L. (2020). Continuing education: Toward a life-course perspective on social learning. Criminology, 58(2), 199–225.
  33. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12244
  34. Akers, R. L., & Jennings, W. G. (2019). Social learning theory and criminal behaviour: Advances and future directions. Annual Review of Criminology, 2, 21–43.
  35. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024703
  36. Paternoster, R., & Iovanni, L. (1989). Differential social control, tagging theory, and the subsequent delinquency of adjudicated delinquents. Criminology, 27(2), 257–294.
  37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1989.tb00826.x
  38. Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M. D. (2000). The self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime. Criminal Justice, 4, 33–83.
  39. https://doi.org/10.1086/652389
  40. Farrington, D. P. (2003). Methodological issues in life-course criminology. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention, 12(1), 9–31.
  41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511250300088958
  42. Piquero, A. R. (2015). A life-course perspective on criminal career development. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(3), 246–256.
  43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.01.012
  44. Hagan, J., & McCarthy, B. (1997). Mean streets: Youth crime and homelessness. Cambridge University Press.
  45. (Use as background to label/social embeddedness literature)
  46. Messner, S. F., & Rosenfeld, R. (2007). Institutional anomie theory: Integrating macro and micro approaches to crime causation. Avances en PsicologΓ­a Latinoamericana, 25(2), 181–193.
  47. https://doi.org/10.12804/apl25.02.2007.05
  48. Broidy, L., & Agnew, R. (1997). Gender and crime: A general strain theory perspective. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34(3), 275–306.
  49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427897034003002
  50. Piquero, A. R., Farrington, D. P., & Blumstein, A. (2007). Key issues in criminal career research: New analyses of the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development. Cambridge University Press.
  51. Thornberry, T. P. (2005). Explaining multiple patterns of offending across the life course and across generations. Criminology, 43(4), 993–1027.
  52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2005.00029.x
  53. Pahlevan-Sharif, S., Mura, P., & Wijesinghe, S. N. R. (2019). A systematic review of systematic review methodologies in social sciences. International Journal of Management Reviews, 21(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12200