The Effect of Language Intervention Activities on The Performance of Elementary Learners
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the effect of language intervention activities on the performance of fourth-grade pupils at Divisoria Elementary School in Santiago City, Philippines for the School Year 2023-2024. The research involved 82 participants, with 41 learners assigned to the Control group and 41 learners to the Experimental group. A quasi-experimental design, specifically the pretest-posttest design, was employed to measure the effect of the intervention. Data analysis was conducted using Microsoft Excel, ensuring fair treatment of participants' responses for frequency calculation. A paired sample t-test was utilized to analyze significant differences between the two groups pre- and post-testing, with statistical analysis performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20 software. The findings revealed a positive effect of language intervention activities on language performance. The experimental group exhibited a significant improvement in mean performance from the pre-test to the post-test, indicating a substantial increase in their language performance. In contrast, the Control group's mean performance showed minimal change, highlighting the importance of language intervention activities in enhancing language skills. The results underscore the significant improvement of language intervention activities on the identified least mastered competencies of Grade 4 students. A proposed strategic intervention material is the output of this study and it was recommended that the crafted material be adopted by elementary teachers in the school and other teachers in the school division as an additional learning material to address the weaknesses of the learners along the identified least learned competencies.
References
2. Asio, John Mark R. and Jimenez, Edward, Effect of Remediation Activities on Grade 5 Pupils’ Academic Performance in Technology and Livelihood Education (TLE) (August 6, 2020). Asio, J.M.R., & Jimenez, E.C. (2020).. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/8464 .
3. Barnes, C., & Tynan, B. (2007). The adventures of Miranda in the brave new world: Learning in a Web 2.0 millennium. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2WxT1AF
4. Bastedo, M. N., & Gumport, P. J. (2003). Access to what? Mission differentiation and academic stratification in US public higher education. Higher Education, 46(3), 341-359. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2UTiClT
5. Blancia , G. C. (2023). Effectiveness of Remedial Activities in Teaching Numeracy in Improving the Performance of Identified Grade 6 Non-Numerates.
6. Boylan, H. R., & Saxon, D. P. (1999). What works in remediation: Lessons from 30 years of research. Unpublished report. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2vElA3c
7. Bunagan, F. (2012). Strategic Intervention Materials.Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/felixbunagan/strategicinte.
8. Caras, K. (2019). The Effectiveness of Inquiry and Computer Based Learning in Remediation
9. Capuyan, D., Etcuban, J. O., Manguilimotan, R., Padillo, G., Raynera, W., & Onrejas, E. (2019). Mathematics remedial program for elementary learners in Cebu City, Philippines. American Research Journal of Humanities Social Sciences, 2(5), 16-23.
10. Casazza, ME, & Silverman, SL. (1996). Learning assistance and developmental education. Jossey- Bass: San Francisco.
11. Casingal, C. P. (2022). Efficacy of Phil-IRI and remedial classes for Filipinos at the intermediate level. Journal of Sustainable Business, Economics and Finance, 1(2), 47-59.
12. De Jong, E. J., & Harper, C. A. (2005). Preparing mainstream teachers for English-language learners: Is being a good teacher good enough?. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(2), 101-124. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2YbT6KB
13. Driscoll, M. P., & Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of Learning for Instruction. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2H0Tswr
14. Eno, M. A. (2019). Impact of remedial teaching on ESL/EFL low achievers: An Arabian Gulf experience. International Journal of English Research, 5(2), 58-64.
15. Etu, 0.C. (2009) “Underachieving learners: Can they learn at all?" ARECLS. Vol. 6. 84 102.
16. Gifford, L. S. (2013). The mature organism model. Whiplash—science and management: Fear, avoidance beliefs and behaviour. Topical Issues in Pain, 1, 45-56. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/302bvem
17. https://pahinadepedsantiago.com/2022/03/11/las-quarter-1/
18. Jarrar, E. T. M. (2014). The impact of remedial classes on the performance of the fourth grade low achievers in English in public schools in Ramallah district (Doctoral dissertation).
19. Luoch, T. O. (2014). The impact of remedial English on the improvement of English proficiency: The case of the United States international university-Africa. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 1178-1188.
20. Mroczek DK & Little, TD. (2006). Handbook of personality development.
21. Nugent M, Gannon, L, Mullan, Y., & 0' Rourke D. (2012). "Effective interventions for struggling readers. A good practice guide for teachers" National Education Psychological Service. http//www.educatio ie. /neps literacy good practice guide
22. Parker, L T, Bustillos, T. & Behringer, L. ( 2010). “Remedial and developmental education policy at crossroads", University of Massachusetts, Boston, www.cLkeseerx Ist psu.edu USA
23. Perin, D. (2006). Can community colleges protect both access and standards? The problem of remediation. Teachers College Record, 108(3), 339-373.
24. Rai, H., & Penjor, S. (2020). The Impact of remedial class on pupils’ learning achievement. Contemporary Education and Teaching Research, 1(2), 27-34.
25. Reichardt, C. S. (2009). Quasi-experimental design. The SAGE handbook of quantitative methods in psychology, 46-71.
26. Sharples, J Slavn, R, & Chambers, B (2011). “Effective classroom strategies for closing the gap in educational achievement for children and young people living in poverty. Retrieved from www.s4eo.org
27. Shanaaa, Z., & Hamadab, N. H. Remedial Classes for Middle School Pupils: Evidence from UAE.
28. Siegel, L.S. (1995). Reading and writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal. Kluwer Academic Publisher. http://www.researchncl.ac.yk.ARECLS/volum_6/ogbonnia_vol6.pdf
29. Sepyanda, M. (2019) The importance of english subject in elementary school curriculum
30. Salas, C., & Bowers (2001). The effects of an after-school tutoring program on the academic performance of at-risk pupils and pupils with LD. Remedial and Special Education, 22(3), 172-186. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2JjMaqI
31. Thilges, N., & Schmer, C. (2020). A concept analysis of remediation. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 15(1), 98-103.
32. Rowntree, D. (2015). Assessing pupils: How shall we know them?. Routledge. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2WrfTkY
33. Stronge, J. H. (2018). Qualities of effective teachers. ASCD. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2PWF2lr
34. Zaman, S. (2010). Relationship between cognitive levels, moral reasoning and academic achievement of secondary school pupils (Doctoral dissertation, University of Punjab, Lahore). Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2ZXEVdY
Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.