ISSN 2456-2653
server-injected
ArticlesOpen Access

The Meaning of Bantengan Art in Moslem Communities in Indonesia

, ,
DOI: 10.18535/sshj.v8i06.1126· Vol. 8, No. 06, (2024)· Published: June 11, 2024
PDF
Views: 180 PDF downloads: 216

Abstract

This research aims to examine the meaning of Bantengan art in the Moslem community of Leban Hamlet, Tawangargo Village, Karangploso District, Malang Regency, Indonesia. This research uses a descriptive ethnographic approach with the theory of symbolic interactionism and ritual communication as an analysis theory. The data collection methods used were in-depth interviews, participant observation, and documentation. The sampling technique used non probability sampling with seven informants. The results of this study show that Bantengan art as a form of ritual communication functions as a gathering place, affirmation of mutual trust, respect for dhanyangan, request for safety and keep away from danger. The people of Leban Hamlet still maintain the art as a form of maintaining ancestral heritage, although in practice most of them only follow Bantengan art activities without knowing the philosophical basis of the art. This research also found that there are symbols that are full of meaning. In the process, there are different interpretations from each individual depending on their background. Nonetheless, there is an effort to respect the understanding that has been mutually agreed upon. 

Keywords

BantenganEthnographyMoslem communityRitual CommunicationSymbolic Interactionism

References

  1. Carey, J. W. (2009). Communication as Culture: Essay on media and society. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar ↗
  2. Dewi, M., Safitri, S. & Scorviana, N. (2022). Interaksionisme Simbolik Masyarakat Tradisional Dewa Tawun dalam Memaknai Eksistensi Tradisi Keduk Beji pada Era Modernisasi (Studi Deskriptif pada Masyarakat Desa Tawun, Kecamatan Kasreman. Jurnal Studi Budaya Nusantara, 6(2), 94-103.Google Scholar ↗
  3. Dissanayake, W. (2011). The Production of Asian Theories of Communication: Contexts and Challenges. Newyork: Routledge.Google Scholar ↗
  4. Handayani, S. (2018). Agriculture and Ritual: Pola Komunikasi Ritual Slametan Musim Tanam Padi di Ngemplak, Sambikereb, Surabaya. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi (J-IKA), V(1), 40–50.Google Scholar ↗
  5. Ida, R., et al. (2024). Socio-cultural values in managing risk communication during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Cogent Social Science, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2287288DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  6. Kincaid & Cushman. (1897). Communication Theory: Eastern and Western Perspective. Academic Press.Google Scholar ↗
  7. Koentjaraningrat. (1984). Kebudayaan Jawa. Balai Pustaka.Google Scholar ↗
  8. Kriyantono, R. (2015). Public Relation & Crisis Management Pendekatan Criitical Public Relation, Etnografi Kritis & Kualitatif. Kencana Prenada Media Group.Google Scholar ↗
  9. Kriyantono, R., & McKenna, B. (2017). Developing a Culturally-Relevant Public Relations Theory for Indonesia. Malaysian Journal of Communication, 33(1). https://ejournal.ukm.my/mjc/article/view/17165.Google Scholar ↗
  10. Kriyantono, R. (2017). Teori-teori public relations perspektif barat dan local: Aplikasi penelitian dan praktek. Jakarta: Prenada Media.Google Scholar ↗
  11. Kriyantono, R., & Sa’diyah, H. (2018). Kearifan Lokal dan Strategi Komunikasi <i>Public Relations</i> di BUMN dan Perusahaan Swasta. Jurnal ILMU KOMUNIKASI, 15(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.24002/jik.v15i2.1480Kriyantono, R. (2019).DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  12. Counteracting Radicalism with Cultural Communication in Religious Practices. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 6(11), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.610.7341.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  13. Kriyantono, R. (2022). Teknik Praktis Riset Komunikasi Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif (Edisis kedua.). Jakarta: Prenada media Group.Google Scholar ↗
  14. Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2019). Theories of Human Communication (Edisi 9.). Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.Google Scholar ↗
  15. Miike, Y. (2002). Theorizing Culture and Communication in the Asian Context: An Assumptive Foundation. Intercultural Communication Studies, 11 (1),1-21.Google Scholar ↗
  16. Mulayan, D. (2013). Ilmu Komunikasi: Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.Google Scholar ↗
  17. Picasso, N. N., & Kriyantono, R. (2024). Kolaborasi antar aktor komunikasi organisasi dalam upaya pengembangan tradisi menjadi event festival melalui negosiasi integratif dengan pendekatan coordinated management of meaning. Kaganga:Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah dan Riset Sosial Humaniora, 7(1), 43-64. https://doi.org/10.31539/kaganga.v7i1.8270DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  18. Prihastuti, D., & Laturrakhmi, Y. F. (2017). Sebuah Studi Tentang Komunikasi Ritual dalam Tarian Seblang Banyuwangi. Jurnal Studi Budaya Nusantara.1(2), 72-79.Google Scholar ↗
  19. Radhia, H. A. (2019). Pergelaran Bantengan “Banteng Wareng” Madyopuro Malang: Telaah Antropologi Kesenian. Jurnal Studi Budaya Nusantara. 3(2), 117-128Google Scholar ↗
  20. West, R., & Turner, L. H. (2017) Pengantar teori komunikasi. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.Google Scholar ↗
  21. Widyowati, E., Kriyantono, R., & Prasetyo, B. D. (2018). Model manajemen konflik berbasis kearifan lokal: Konflik perguruan pencak silat di Madiun – Jawa Timur. Jurnal Komunikator, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.18196/jkm.101004DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
Author details
Shofi Amalia Islami
Brawijaya University
✉ Corresponding Author
👤 View Profile →🔗 Is this you? Claim this publication