The Meaning of Bantengan Art in Moslem Communities in Indonesia

Shofi Amalia Islami Prof Rachmat Kriyantono Fitria Avicenna

Abstract

This research aims to examine the meaning of Bantengan art in the Moslem community of Leban Hamlet, Tawangargo Village, Karangploso District, Malang Regency, Indonesia. This research uses a descriptive ethnographic approach with the theory of symbolic interactionism and ritual communication as an analysis theory. The data collection methods used were in-depth interviews, participant observation, and documentation. The sampling technique used non probability sampling with seven informants. The results of this study show that Bantengan art as a form of ritual communication functions as a gathering place, affirmation of mutual trust, respect for dhanyangan, request for safety and keep away from danger. The people of Leban Hamlet still maintain the art as a form of maintaining ancestral heritage, although in practice most of them only follow Bantengan art activities without knowing the philosophical basis of the art. This research also found that there are symbols that are full of meaning. In the process, there are different interpretations from each individual depending on their background. Nonetheless, there is an effort to respect the understanding that has been mutually agreed upon. 

References

1. Carey, J. W. (2009). Communication as Culture: Essay on media and society. New York: Routledge.
2. Dewi, M., Safitri, S. & Scorviana, N. (2022). Interaksionisme Simbolik Masyarakat Tradisional Dewa Tawun dalam Memaknai Eksistensi Tradisi Keduk Beji pada Era Modernisasi (Studi Deskriptif pada Masyarakat Desa Tawun, Kecamatan Kasreman. Jurnal Studi Budaya Nusantara, 6(2), 94-103.
3. Dissanayake, W. (2011). The Production of Asian Theories of Communication: Contexts and Challenges. Newyork: Routledge.
4. Handayani, S. (2018). Agriculture and Ritual: Pola Komunikasi Ritual Slametan Musim Tanam Padi di Ngemplak, Sambikereb, Surabaya. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi (J-IKA), V(1), 40–50.
5. Ida, R., et al. (2024). Socio-cultural values in managing risk communication during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Cogent Social Science, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2287288
6. Kincaid & Cushman. (1897). Communication Theory: Eastern and Western Perspective. Academic Press.
7. Koentjaraningrat. (1984). Kebudayaan Jawa. Balai Pustaka.
8. Kriyantono, R. (2015). Public Relation & Crisis Management Pendekatan Criitical Public Relation, Etnografi Kritis & Kualitatif. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
9. Kriyantono, R., & McKenna, B. (2017). Developing a Culturally-Relevant Public Relations Theory for Indonesia. Malaysian Journal of Communication, 33(1). https://ejournal.ukm.my/mjc/article/view/17165.
10. Kriyantono, R. (2017). Teori-teori public relations perspektif barat dan local: Aplikasi penelitian dan praktek. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
11. Kriyantono, R., & Sa’diyah, H. (2018). Kearifan Lokal dan Strategi Komunikasi Public Relations di BUMN dan Perusahaan Swasta. Jurnal ILMU KOMUNIKASI, 15(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.24002/jik.v15i2.1480Kriyantono, R. (2019).
12. Counteracting Radicalism with Cultural Communication in Religious Practices. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 6(11), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.610.7341.
13. Kriyantono, R. (2022). Teknik Praktis Riset Komunikasi Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif (Edisis kedua.). Jakarta: Prenada media Group.
14. Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2019). Theories of Human Communication (Edisi 9.). Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
15. Miike, Y. (2002). Theorizing Culture and Communication in the Asian Context: An Assumptive Foundation. Intercultural Communication Studies, 11 (1),1-21.
16. Mulayan, D. (2013). Ilmu Komunikasi: Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
17. Picasso, N. N., & Kriyantono, R. (2024). Kolaborasi antar aktor komunikasi organisasi dalam upaya pengembangan tradisi menjadi event festival melalui negosiasi integratif dengan pendekatan coordinated management of meaning. Kaganga:Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah dan Riset Sosial Humaniora, 7(1), 43-64. https://doi.org/10.31539/kaganga.v7i1.8270
18. Prihastuti, D., & Laturrakhmi, Y. F. (2017). Sebuah Studi Tentang Komunikasi Ritual dalam Tarian Seblang Banyuwangi. Jurnal Studi Budaya Nusantara.1(2), 72-79.
19. Radhia, H. A. (2019). Pergelaran Bantengan “Banteng Wareng” Madyopuro Malang: Telaah Antropologi Kesenian. Jurnal Studi Budaya Nusantara. 3(2), 117-128
20. West, R., & Turner, L. H. (2017) Pengantar teori komunikasi. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
21. Widyowati, E., Kriyantono, R., & Prasetyo, B. D. (2018). Model manajemen konflik berbasis kearifan lokal: Konflik perguruan pencak silat di Madiun – Jawa Timur. Jurnal Komunikator, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.18196/jkm.101004

Authors

Shofi Amalia Islami
Prof Rachmat Kriyantono
Fitria Avicenna
Author Biography

Prof Rachmat Kriyantono, Brawijaya University

Professor in Public Relations Science

[1]
“The Meaning of Bantengan Art in Moslem Communities in Indonesia”, Soc. sci. humanities j., vol. 8, no. 06, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.18535/sshj.v8i06.1126.