Sensory and Psychological Study of Users at Airport Bali

Alya Syarifa Ramadhani Susy Budi Astuti Firman Hawari

Abstract

The sensory modality, which plays a dominant role in spatial perception in humans, is essential for recognizing the geometric structure of the surrounding environment. The interaction between the body, imagination, and environment in the interior experience contributes to the formation of memories from visited places. This paper is conducted to explore the impact of human senses on spatial perception and the psychological effects of different environments and experiences on visitors. Focusing on the interior environment of Bali's airport and incorporating elements of Balinese culture, this study examines how sensory experiences can significantly influence the psychology of tourists. Through comprehensive literature reviews, the research aims to provide insights into the integration of multisensory elements and cultural aspects in airport design to enhance the overall experience and emotional well-being of travellers.

References

1. Atmodiwirjo, P., & Yatmo, Y. A. (2019). Interiority In Everyday Space: A Dialogue Between Materiality And Occupation. Interiority, 2(1), 1–4. Doi: 10.7454/In.V2i1.56.
2. Fulkerson, Matthew. (2014). Explaining Multisensory Experience. 10.1007/978-94-007-6001-1_25.
3. Hadjiphilippou, P. (2013). The Contribution Of The Five Human Senses Towards The Perception of Space.
4. Hartati, A., & Sutanto, A. (2019). Pengalaman Ruang Melalui Lima Indera. Jurnal Sains, Teknologi, Urban, Perancangan, Arsitektur (Stupa), 1, 497. Doi: 10.24912/Stupa.V1i1.3807.
5. Hashemnezhad, H., Heidari, A. A., & Mohammad Hoseini, P. (2013). “Sense of Place” And “Place Attachment. International Journal of Architecture And Urban Development.
6. Holland, J. (2017). "Sense of Place Now A Key Part of The Airport Experience, Says Latest M1nd-Set Report." The Moodie Davitt Report. Accessed on 25 December 2023, Https://Www.Moodiedavittreport.Com/Sense-of-Place-Now-A-Key-Part-of-The-Airportexperience-Says-Latest-M1nd-Set-Report/.
7. IAI Bali. (2015). "Konservasi Bangunan Bersejarah" Perlunya Tim Ahli Bangunan Cagar Budaya (TACB) Di Daerah (Vol. 2). IAI Daerah Bali.
8. Irvin, A. (2019). The Anthropology of Vision, Memory & The Senses.
9. James, K., & Vinci-Booher, S., & Munoz-Rubke, F. (2017). The Impact of Multimodal-Multisensory Learning On Human Performance And Brain Activation Patterns. Doi: 10.1145/3015783.3015787.
10. Joseph, S. (2014). Multi-Sensory Working Memoryc - In Vision, Audition and Touch. UCL (University College London).
11. Kartiningrum, E. D. (2015). Panduan Penyusunan Studi Literatur.
12. Kim, S-W. (2004). Vision And Responsiveness: The Problem of Experience In The Architectures of The East And The West. Journal of Architectural History.
13. Li, W. (2016). The Inheritance And Development of Traditional Culture In Interior Design And Three Dimensional Structure. Advances In Social Science, Education And Humanities Research, 286(8), 967-971.
14. Mäkelä, A. (2020). Multi-Sensory Experience Design In Museums.
15. Mccarter, R. (2020). The Space Within: Interior Experience As The Origin of Architecture. Retrieved From Https://Scholarsjunction.Msstate.Edu/Caad-Harrison/4.
16. Montgomery, J. (1998). Making a City: Urbanity, Vitality and Urban Design. Journal of Urban Design, 3, 93-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13574809808724418
17. Oviatt, S. (2017). Theoretical Foundations of Multimodal Interfaces And Systems. The Handbook oMultimodal-Multisensor Interfaces, Volume 1: Foundations, User Modeling, And Common Modality Combinations. Doi: 10.1145/3015783.3015786.
18. Picard, Michel. (1995). Cultural Heritage and Tourist Capital: Cultural Tourism in Bali.
19. Raka, A. A. G., Parwata, I. W., Gunawarman, A. A. G. R. (2017). Pustaka Larasan. Universitas Warmadewa Denpasar.
20. Reddy, S. M., et al. (2012). Emotion and interior space design: An ergonomic perspective. Department of Design, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati.
21. Relph, E. (1976). Place And Placelessness. London: Pion.
22. Riska, A. S. (2016). Peran Panca Indra Dalam Pengalaman Ruang.
23. Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining Place Attachment: A Tripartite Organizing Framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1). Doi: 10.1016/J.Jenvp.2009.09.006.
24. Seamon, D., & Sowers, J. (2008). Place And Placelessness, Edward Relph. Chapter In Hubbard P, R. Kitchen, & G. Vallentine, Eds. Key Texts In Human Geography.
25. Spence, C. (2020). Senses of Place: Architectural Design For The Multisensory Mind. Cogn. Research, 5, 46. Doi: 10.1186/S41235-020-00243-4.
26. Stedman, R.C. (2003). Is It Really Just A Social Construction?: The Contribution of The Physical Environment To Sense of Place. Society & Natural Resources, 16, 671-685.
27. Steele Fritz. (1981). The Sense of Place. Boston Mass: CBI Pub.
28. Stokols, D., & Shumaker, S. A. (1981). People In Places: A Transactional View of Settings. In J. Harvey (Ed.), Cognition, Social Behavior, and The Environment (Pp. 441–488). Hillsdale, Nj: Erlbaum.
29. Trisno, R., Lianto, F., & Choandi, M. (2020). An Interior-Architecture Concept For Fashion-Accessory-Interior: Transforming Space From Body To Transformable Fashion Interior. International Journal of Engineering Research And Technology, 13(11), 3262. Doi: 10.37624/Ijert/13.11.2020.3262-3265.
30. Tuan, Y-F. (2001). Space And Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
31. Wattanacharoensil, W., Schuckert, M., & Graham, A. (2015). An Airport Experience Framework From A Tourism Perspective. Transport Reviews. Doi: 10.1080/01441647.2015.1077287.
32. Yasin, G. S., Christina Shirleen., Widjaja, D. C. (2019). Analisa Perbedaan Persepsi Konsumen Generasi X Dan Generasi Y Terhadap Kualitas Lingkungan Fisik Di Kafe Petrichor Surabaya. Jurnal Hospitality Dan Manajemen Jasa. Universitas Kristen Petra.

Authors

Alya Syarifa Ramadhani
Susy Budi Astuti
Firman Hawari
[1]
“Sensory and Psychological Study of Users at Airport Bali”, Soc. sci. humanities j., vol. 8, no. 07, pp. 4358–4370, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.18535/sshj.v8i07.1204.