Primary School Teachers’ Participation in The National Curriculum Development in Namibia
Abstract
The subject of this investigation was the extent to which primary school teachers in Onamutai Circuit in Oshana region of Namibia participate in national curriculum development. The research objective for this study was to determine the roles primary school teachers in Onamutai circuit play in the development of the national curriculum as well as identify factors that inhibit their participation in the national curriculum development. The study was framed within an interpretivist research paradigm, emphasizing the subjective experiences of primary school teachers in Onamutai circuit. It adopted a qualitative research design, specifically a case study approach, to provide a detailed and contextually rich exploration of primary school teachers' participation in national curriculum development. The population included all primary school teachers in the Onamutai circuit and all 12 senior education officers in Oshana region, with a sample of 20 primary school teachers and 2 senior education officers selected through purposive sampling. The primary research instrument was semi-structured interviews. Data analysis was conducted using thematic analysis. The research findings revealed that primary school teachers in the Onamutai circuit of Oshana region have varying levels of involvement in the national curriculum development. While some primary school teachers participate directly in national curriculum committees and working groups, others feel marginalized and excluded from the process of national curriculum development. This disparity suggests a significant gap between the intentions of inclusive national curriculum development policies and their practical implementation. The study highlighted the need for more structured and inclusive approaches to ensure that all primary school teachers in Onamutai circuit of Oshana region can contribute meaningfully to national curriculum development.
References
2. Borko, H. (2014). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15.
3. Borg, S. (2018). Teacher research in language teaching: A critical analysis. Cambridge University Press.
4. Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2019). Teacher learning: What matters? Educational Leadership, 66(5), 46-53.
5. Fullan, M. (2017). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
6. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2017). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.
7. Harris, A., & Muijs, D. (2015). Improving schools through teacher leadership. Open University Press.
8. Iipinge, S. M., & Kasanda, C. D. (2013). Challenges associated with curriculum alignment, change and assessment reforms in Namibia. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20(4), 424-441.
9. Kennedy, M. M. (2015). Inside teaching: How classroom life undermines reform. Harvard University Press.
10. MacDonald, A., Barton, G., Baguley, M., & Hartwig, K. (2016). Teachers’ curriculum stories: Perceptions and preparedness to enact change. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(13), 1336-1351.
11. Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2017). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921-958.
12. Shikalepo, E. E. (2019). The constitutionality of free education in Namibia: A statutory review. International Journal of Latest Research in Humanities and Social Science (IJLRHSS), 02(09), 115-121.
13. Stoll, L., & Seashore Louis, K. (2007). Professional Learning Communities: Divergence, Depth And Dilemmas: Divergence, Depth and Dilemmas. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
14. Wadesango, N. (2022). Professionalisation of teaching in South Africa. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 25, 1-9.
Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.