Scholarly Exploration of Nationalism: A Retrospective View
Abstract
The paper embarked on a scholarly exploration, seeking to unravel the intricate dimensions of nationalism and enhance our collective understanding. Through qualitative methodology—specifically contextual analysis—the study vividly examined the interpretations of influential thinkers regarding this complex concept. Topics spanned from “Nationalism and Its Relationship to a Nation” to “Theoretical Perspectives on Nationalism” and “Filipino Nationalism: Historical Context, Critical Issues, and Developments.” The analysis revealed that nationalism, as a subject, underwent extensive scholarly debate and analysis, reflecting its multifaceted nature and profound impact on nation-building and identity formation. In retrospect, the discourse surrounding nationalism encompassed diverse perspectives, ranging from its role in political and social transformation to its enduring influence on human history
References
2. Agoncillo, T. A. & Guerrero, M. C. (2002). The History of Filipino People (8th ed). R.P. Garcia Publishing Co. Quezon City, Philippines.
3. Akmad, S., Akmad, A., (2024). From Stereotypes to Sentiments: A Qualitative Study on Millennial Attitudes towards Muslims and their Root Causes. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20(7), 939-944. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11583050
4. Anderson, B. R. O. 1. (2006). Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Rev. ed. London; New York, Verso.
5. Bonikowski, B. (2016). Nationalism in settled times. Annual Review of Sociology, 42(0), 427-449. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074412
6. Bonikowski, B., & DiMaggio, P. (2016). Varieties of American popular nationalism. American Sociological Review, 81(5), 949–980.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122416663683
7. Cohler, A. M. (1970). Rousseau and nationalism. Basic Books. 212-215. https://archive.org/details/rousseaunational0000cohl/page/n7/mode/1up
8. Gellner, E. (1998). The State of the Nation: Theory of Nationalism. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, United Kingdom.
9. Ileto, R. (1985). Critical Questions on Nationalism: A Historian View. Diamond Jubilee Publication, De La Salle University.
10. Kundra, N. (2019). Understanding nation and nationalism. Interdisciplinary Literary Studies, 21(2), 125–145.
https://doi.org/10.5325/intelitestud.21.2.0125
11. Meadows, M. (1970). Colonialism, social structure, and nationalism: The Philippine case. Pacific Affairs, 43(3), 394–413. https://doi.org/10.2307/2755708
12. Orwell, G. (2018). Notes on Nationalism. Penguin Classics. Penguin Classics Publishing. London, England.
13. Pianko, N. (2010). Did Kohn Believe in the “Kohn Dichotomy”? Reconsidering Kohn’s Journey from The Political Idea of Judaism to the Idea of Nationalism. The Leo Baeck Institute Year Book, 55(1), 295–311. DOI: 10.1093/lbyb/ybq039
14. Quibuyen, F. (2002). Rizal and Filipino nationalism: Critical issues. Philippine Studies, 50(2), 193–229.
https://doi.org/10.1353/phs.2002.0010
15. Smith, A. (1995). Nationalism. Oxford University Press, United States of America.
16. Zaide, Gregorio F. (1984). José Rizal: life, works, and writings of a genius, writer, scientist, and national hero. Metro Manila, Philippines:National Book Store
17. Zaide, S. M. (2013). The Philippines: A Unique Nation (2nd ed). All-Nations Publishing Co., Inc., Quezon City.
Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.