Islamic values in "Bhupa' Bhabbhu' Ghuru Rato" on The Madurese Mondok (Boarding) Tradition
Abstract
This research aims to explore the meaning of religiosity and cultural compliance of Bhupa' Bhabbhu' Ghuru Rato in Madurese society. This culture is the values, guidelines, norms of life that are believed by the community for generations. In the context of communication studies, tradition and culture become an interesting research phenomenon. Islam and culture are inseparable. This research uses the ethnographic method of communication in the community of Brambang Hamlet, Sumenep, which has a tradition of Islamic boarding school (Pondok Pesantren). This research reveals that the meaning of the value of religiosity and Bhuppa'-Bhabbhu'-Ghuru-Rato obedience of each individual community varies based on their respective experiences and perspectives obtained from the symbolic interaction process. Nevertheless, all informants in this study agreed that the mondok tradition is important to be preserved in order to teach and develop the values of religiosity and obedience.
References
1. Achmad, Z. A. (2019). Integration of da'wah and cultural programs: Virtual ethnographic study of mediamorphosis of Nada FM radio Sumenep Madura. Journal of Islamic Communication, 9(2), 238-263.
2. Amalia, L., & Hayat, H. (2019). Strengthening the capacity of andeb ashor culture and patronization of Madurese society. Journal of Social and Political Science Innovation, 1(1), 38-42.
3. Adli F. N., & Anshori, M, S (2021). The Jakmania Petukangan's symbolic interaction in interpreting its presence in the community. Tambora Journal, 5(3), 8-14.
4. Ardianto, E. (2007). Mass communication an introduction. Bandung: Refika Offset.
5. Aw, S. (2010). Socio-cultural communication. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
6. Bahesa, S. P., & Nurudin. (2021). Ethnography of taneyan community communication as Pamekasan's cultural identity. Journal of Research and Development of Science and Humanities, 5(3), 478-480.
7. Berger, C. R., Roloff, M. E., & Ewoldsen-Roskos, D. R. (2014). Handbook of communication science. Bandung: Communication Sciences.
8. Castels, M. (2010). The rise of the network society: The information age: Economy, Society, and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.
9. Dzulkarnain, I., Soetarto, E., Kinseng, R. A., & Sjaf, S. (2020). Nyadar: Religious and cultural resistance of Maduranese salt farming community. Sodality: Journal of Rural Sociology, 8(2), 174-190.
10. Effendy, M. H. (2021). Theory & methods of Madurese ethnic cultural studies. Surabaya: CV. Jakad Media Publishing.
11. Fitraza, V. (2008). Symbolic interaction theory. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju.
12. Fitriati, S. A. (2020). Bhuppa' bhabbhu' ghuru rato in the cultural character of Madurese society. (SKRIPSI, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel, 2020). accessed from http://digilib.uinsa.ac.id/44436/11/Aida%20Sofia%20Fitriati_A02216004.pdf
13. Haliemah, N. (2016). Community symbolic interaction in interpreting jathilan art. Yogyakarta: State Islamic University of Yogyakarta.
14. Haris, A., & Amalia, A. (2018). Meaning and symbols in the process of social interaction (A communication review). TREATISE, 29(1), 16-19.
15. Hefni, M. (2007). Bhuppa'-Bhabbhu'-Ghuru-Rato (A constructivist-structuralist study of the hierarchy of obedience in Madurese culture. KARSA, 11(1), 12-20.
16. Kholis, M. A., & Kurnia, W. (2021). The god flute as a symbolic identity of the Sasak Kuto-Kute community in Karang Bajo Bayan North Lombok. Journal of Art Studies, 8(1), 15-35.
17. Kriyantono, R. (2024). Teknik praktis riset komunikasi kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Edisi 2. Jakarta: Prenada.
18. Kriyantono, R. (2019). Pengantar lengkap ilmu komunikasi: Filsafat dan etika ilmunya serta perspektif Islam. Jakarta: Prenada.
19. Kriyantono, R., & McKenna, B. (2017). Developing a culturally-relevant public relations theory for Indonesia. Malaysian Journal of Communication, 33(1), https://ejournal.ukm.my/mjc/article/view/17165
20. Kriyantono, R. (2015). Public relations, crisis & issue management. Jakarta: Prenada.
21. Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2011). Theorities of human communication (10thth ed.). USA: Waveland Press.
22. Marsh, D & Stoker, G. (2021). Qualitative methods and quantitative methods: Political science theory and methods series. Jakarta: Nusamedia.
23. Mufida, S. P. (2020). "Barocatology" as the philosophical foundation of pesantren instructional communication (An explorative study with a non-western perspective on education at Pondok Pesantren Modern Darussalam Gontor). (SKRIPSI, Universitas Brawijaya Malang, 2020). accessed from http://repository.ub.ac.id/ id/eprint/180701/
24. Mulyana, D. (2012). Cultures and communication Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
25. Mulyana, D. (2016). Communication science an introduction.Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
26. Wahyuni, D. (2018). Jakatarub and religious harmony in Bandung City. Temali: Journal of National Development, 1(2), 259-289.
27. West, R., & Turner, L. H. (2008). Introduction to communication theory analysis and applications: 3rd edition: Salemba Humanika.
28. Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2006). Mass media research: An introduction (8thth ed.). California: Thompson Wadsworth.
29. Yohana, A., & Saifulloh, M. (2019). Symbolic interaction in building communication between superiors and subordinates in the company. DISCOURSE, 18(1), 122-130.
2. Amalia, L., & Hayat, H. (2019). Strengthening the capacity of andeb ashor culture and patronization of Madurese society. Journal of Social and Political Science Innovation, 1(1), 38-42.
3. Adli F. N., & Anshori, M, S (2021). The Jakmania Petukangan's symbolic interaction in interpreting its presence in the community. Tambora Journal, 5(3), 8-14.
4. Ardianto, E. (2007). Mass communication an introduction. Bandung: Refika Offset.
5. Aw, S. (2010). Socio-cultural communication. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
6. Bahesa, S. P., & Nurudin. (2021). Ethnography of taneyan community communication as Pamekasan's cultural identity. Journal of Research and Development of Science and Humanities, 5(3), 478-480.
7. Berger, C. R., Roloff, M. E., & Ewoldsen-Roskos, D. R. (2014). Handbook of communication science. Bandung: Communication Sciences.
8. Castels, M. (2010). The rise of the network society: The information age: Economy, Society, and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.
9. Dzulkarnain, I., Soetarto, E., Kinseng, R. A., & Sjaf, S. (2020). Nyadar: Religious and cultural resistance of Maduranese salt farming community. Sodality: Journal of Rural Sociology, 8(2), 174-190.
10. Effendy, M. H. (2021). Theory & methods of Madurese ethnic cultural studies. Surabaya: CV. Jakad Media Publishing.
11. Fitraza, V. (2008). Symbolic interaction theory. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju.
12. Fitriati, S. A. (2020). Bhuppa' bhabbhu' ghuru rato in the cultural character of Madurese society. (SKRIPSI, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel, 2020). accessed from http://digilib.uinsa.ac.id/44436/11/Aida%20Sofia%20Fitriati_A02216004.pdf
13. Haliemah, N. (2016). Community symbolic interaction in interpreting jathilan art. Yogyakarta: State Islamic University of Yogyakarta.
14. Haris, A., & Amalia, A. (2018). Meaning and symbols in the process of social interaction (A communication review). TREATISE, 29(1), 16-19.
15. Hefni, M. (2007). Bhuppa'-Bhabbhu'-Ghuru-Rato (A constructivist-structuralist study of the hierarchy of obedience in Madurese culture. KARSA, 11(1), 12-20.
16. Kholis, M. A., & Kurnia, W. (2021). The god flute as a symbolic identity of the Sasak Kuto-Kute community in Karang Bajo Bayan North Lombok. Journal of Art Studies, 8(1), 15-35.
17. Kriyantono, R. (2024). Teknik praktis riset komunikasi kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Edisi 2. Jakarta: Prenada.
18. Kriyantono, R. (2019). Pengantar lengkap ilmu komunikasi: Filsafat dan etika ilmunya serta perspektif Islam. Jakarta: Prenada.
19. Kriyantono, R., & McKenna, B. (2017). Developing a culturally-relevant public relations theory for Indonesia. Malaysian Journal of Communication, 33(1), https://ejournal.ukm.my/mjc/article/view/17165
20. Kriyantono, R. (2015). Public relations, crisis & issue management. Jakarta: Prenada.
21. Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2011). Theorities of human communication (10thth ed.). USA: Waveland Press.
22. Marsh, D & Stoker, G. (2021). Qualitative methods and quantitative methods: Political science theory and methods series. Jakarta: Nusamedia.
23. Mufida, S. P. (2020). "Barocatology" as the philosophical foundation of pesantren instructional communication (An explorative study with a non-western perspective on education at Pondok Pesantren Modern Darussalam Gontor). (SKRIPSI, Universitas Brawijaya Malang, 2020). accessed from http://repository.ub.ac.id/ id/eprint/180701/
24. Mulyana, D. (2012). Cultures and communication Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
25. Mulyana, D. (2016). Communication science an introduction.Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
26. Wahyuni, D. (2018). Jakatarub and religious harmony in Bandung City. Temali: Journal of National Development, 1(2), 259-289.
27. West, R., & Turner, L. H. (2008). Introduction to communication theory analysis and applications: 3rd edition: Salemba Humanika.
28. Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2006). Mass media research: An introduction (8thth ed.). California: Thompson Wadsworth.
29. Yohana, A., & Saifulloh, M. (2019). Symbolic interaction in building communication between superiors and subordinates in the company. DISCOURSE, 18(1), 122-130.
Authors
[1]
“Islamic values in ‘Bhupa’ Bhabbhu’ Ghuru Rato’ on The Madurese Mondok (Boarding) Tradition”, Soc. sci. humanities j., vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 5289–5302, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.18535/sshj.v8i10.1323.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.