Distribution of The Health Workers in The Tuberculosis Sector, Mongolia: Assessment Results Using the Gini Index

Oyunchimeg Erdenee Sekar Ayu Paramita Ariunbolor Demchig Baigalmaa Jantsansengee Bilegtsaikhan Tsolmon Amartuvshin Tumenjargal Battur Lkhagvaa Purevsod Lkhagvasuren Anuzaya Purevdagva Kei Hamazaki

Abstract

Background: Mongolia was classified as one of the 30 countries with the highest tuberculosis burden by World Health Organization in 2021 and tuberculosis is the first leading cause of mortality among deaths from all communicable diseases in the country. The number and distribution of health workers to provide tuberculosis healthcare services will play an important role in the fight against tuberculosis. However, there has been no quantitative evaluation of the distribution of tuberculosis health workers in Mongolia. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the distribution of health workers in the tuberculosis sector using the Gini index. The results provide quantifiable information for monitoring resource distribution and serve as a basis for informed decision-making on resource allocation, facilitating targeted interventions and equitable healthcare distribution in Mongolia.


Methods: Data from the National Center for Communicable Diseases and the National Statistical Information Service of Mongolia was obtained and analyzed. The Gini coefficients were calculated to reflect the inequality of distributions.


Results: Total number of health workers in the tuberculosis sector was only 1.29 per 10,000 population. The Gini index values for the distribution of tuberculosis doctors, assistant workers, nurses, and laboratory technicians were at 0.61, 0.67, 0.43, and 0.33 respectively, all showing a range from severe to relative inequality.


Conclusions: Findings showed the number and distribution of tuberculosis health workers were both inadequate and unequal and ring the need for proper health system planning. To plan the tuberculosis control and address the high burden of the disease in the country, the human resources situation should be analyzed and handled regularly.


Keywords: Mongolia, Tuberculosis, Health workers, Distribution, Gini index

References

1. World Health Organization. Tuberculosis deaths rise for the first time in more than a decade due to the COVID-19 pandemic, 2021.
2. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2021. 2021.
3. National Statistical Office M. Unified Statistical Database. 2020.
4. Government Resolution. National Program on Prevention and Control of Communicable Diseases. Mongolia; 2017.
5. World Health Organization and World Bank. Incidence of tuberculosis Mongolia. 2020.
6. National Center for Communicable Diseases TB Surveillance and Research Department. Tuberculosis statistic, Mongolia. 2021.
7. World Health Organization and Ministry of Health. NTP joint review Mongolia. Ulaanbaatar; 2022.
8. Z. Wang WJYLLZAZSTXLT tuberculosis (TB) service delivery model in C issues and challenges for health workforce, HR for Health 17 (2019). https://doi. org/10. 1186/s12960-019-0420-2. Transforming tuberculosis (TB) service delivery model in China: issues and challenges for health workforce, Human Resources for Health. Z Wang, W Jiang, Y Liu, L Zhang, A Zhu, S Tang, X Liu,. 2019;17.
9. World Health Organization. Human Resources Development for TB Control, Geneva, Switzerland, 2003. Geneva; 2003.
10. National Statistical Office of Mongolia. National Statistic. 2020.
11. R.F.G. Williams DPD. Measuring inequality: Tools and an illustration. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2006;5.
12. J.I. Levy SMCJLT. Incorporating concepts of inequality and inequity into health benefits analysis. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2006;5.
13. L. Ceriani PV. The origins of the Gini index: Extracts from Variabilità e Mutabilità (1912) by Corrado Gini. J Econ Inequal. 2012;10.
14. Erdenee O, Paramita SA, Yamazaki C, Koyama H. Distribution of health care resources in Mongolia using the Gini coefficient. Hum Resour Health. 2017;15.
15. Paramita SA, Yamazaki C, Setiawati EP, Koyama H. Distribution trends of Indonesia’s health care resources in the decentralization era. International Journal of Health Planning and Management. 2018;33.
16. Ameryoun A, Meskarpour-Amiri M, Dezfuli-Nejad ML, Khoddami-Vishteh HR, Tofighi S. The assessment of inequality on geographical distribution of non-cardiac intensive care beds in Iran. Iran J Public Health. 2011; 40:25–33.
17. Oyunchimeg Erdenee et al. Distribution of midwives in Mongolia: A secondary data analysis. Midwifery. 2020. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2020.102704.
18. R. Chen YZJDTWYHAG. Health workforce equity in urban community health service of China. PLoS ONE. 2014;9.
19. Miao C xia, Zhuo L, Gu Y ming, Qin Z hui. Study of large medical equipment allocation in Xuzhou. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2007;8.
20. X. Dong FXSQZ. A Simple and Practical Method of Calculating the Gini Coefficient. Progress in Applied Mathematics. 2014; 8:29–33.
21. Zhou Y, Qin Y. Empirical analysis on income inequality of Chinese residents. Impact of Rent-seeking on Income Inequality. 2012;1.
22. Department of Standard and Metrology M. The structure and activity of General hospital. Mongolia; 2017.
23. Oyunchimeg Erdenee NPNCB, Tsolmon. Human Resources for TB Care. 2021.
24. Bothamley GH, Kruijshaar ME, Kunst H, Woltmann G, Cotton M, Saralaya D, et al. Tuberculosis in UK cities: Workload and effectiveness of tuberculosis control programmes. BMC Public Health. 2011;11.
25. D.J. Berndt JWFR v. RJS. Measuring healthcare inequities using the Gini index. In: International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS. 2003.
26. Mollahaliloglu S, Yardım M, Telatar TG, Uner S. Change in the geographic distribution of human resources for health in Turkey, 2002-2016. Rural Remote Health. 2021;21.
27. Distribution of nursing workforce in the world using Gini coefficient. 2023.
28. Matsumoto M, Inoue K, Farmer J, Inada H, Kajii E. Geographic distribution of primary care physicians in Japan and Britain. Health Place. 2010;16.
29. Rój J. Inequality in the distribution of healthcare human resources in Poland. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2020;12.
30. UNDP. Inequalities in Human Development in the 21st Century Mongolia. 2019.
31. Narantuya J. Results of tuberculosis patients cost survey in Mongolia and policy implication. Mongolian Journal of Infectious Disease Research. 2018;3:39–40.
32. Graciaa DS, Machaidze M, Kipiani M, Buziashvili M, Barbakadze K, Avaliani Z, et al. A survey of the tuberculosis physician workforce in the country of Georgia. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 2018;22.
33. Harries AD, Zachariah R, Bergström K, Blanc L, Salaniponi FM, Elzinga G. Human resources for control of tuberculosis and HIV-associated tuberculosis. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 2005;9.
34. Szabo S, Nove A, Matthews Z, Bajracharya A, Dhillon I, Singh DR, et al. Health workforce demography: A framework to improve understanding of the health workforce and support achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals. Human Resources for Health. 2020;18.
35. Karan A, Negandhi H, Nair R, Sharma A, Tiwari R, Zodpey S. Size, composition and distribution of human resource for health in India: New estimates using National Sample Survey and Registry data. BMJ Open. 2019;9.
36. Gai R, Xu L, Wang X, Liu Z, Cheng J, Zhou C, et al. The role of village doctors on tuberculosis control and the DOTS strategy in Shandong Province, China. Biosci Trends. 2008;2.
37. World Health Organization. World Tuberculosis Day. 2021.

Authors

Oyunchimeg Erdenee
Sekar Ayu Paramita
Ariunbolor Demchig
Baigalmaa Jantsansengee
Bilegtsaikhan Tsolmon
Amartuvshin Tumenjargal
Battur Lkhagvaa
Purevsod Lkhagvasuren
Anuzaya Purevdagva
Kei Hamazaki
[1]
“Distribution of The Health Workers in The Tuberculosis Sector, Mongolia: Assessment Results Using the Gini Index”, Soc. sci. humanities j., vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 5303–5312, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.18535/sshj.v8i10.1379.