Assessing the Impact of Faculty Development Programs (FDPs) in Bangladesh: A Case Study on Bangladesh University of Professionals (BUP)
Abstract
Faculty Development Programs (FDPs) are organized efforts to improve the teaching, research, and counselling abilities of faculty members. These programs are crucial for filling up teaching quality gaps and adjusting to changing academic expectations, especially in Bangladesh where there are few systematic FDPs. This study assesses how FDPs affect faculty competencies and institutional progress at Bangladesh University of Professionals (BUP). A mixed-methods approach was utilized, which includes surveys with a total of 178 participants, including students and faculty members. Purposive and random sampling techniques both guaranteed thorough data gathering. SPSS was used for data analysis, and the Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests verified that the data were normal (p > 0.05). The results show that FDPs greatly enhance ethical behavior, content creation, and teaching abilities. Nonetheless, few participants reported little advancement in their research understanding, indicating deficiencies in advanced research training. The study suggests more emphasis should be placed on developing research skills in shorter, interactive FDPs that are customized to meet particular requirements. By encouraging professional development and raising the standard of higher education in Bangladesh, these enhancements may increase the effect of FDPs even more.
References
1. Ali, N. M., & Mazhar, M. (2018). Faculty Development Program Model: A Strategic Insight. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(2), 72-93. https://doi.org/10.18843/ijms/v5i3(4)/11
2. Alsalamah, A., & Callinan, C. (2021). Adaptation of Kirkpatrick's four-level Model of Training Criteria to Evaluate Training Programmes for Head Teachers. ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1290265.pdf
3. Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is Qualitative in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7
4. Bhat, A. (2023). Research Design: What it is, Elements & Types. QuestionPro. https://www.questionpro.com/blog/research-design/
5. Bilal, B., & Chen, S. (2019). The impact and effectiveness of faculty development program in fostering the faculty’s knowledge, skills, and professional competence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 26(4), 688–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.10.024
6. Blašková, M., Blaško, R., Figurska, I., & Sokół, A. (2015). Motivation and development of the university teachers’ motivational competence. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.746
7. Buckley H. (2020). Faculty development in the COVID-19 pandemic: so close - yet so far. Med Educ. 2020;20. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14250
8. Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2016). Student Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9
9. DeBell, A. (2023). What is Kirkpatrick’s Training Evaluation Model? Water Bear Learning. https://waterbearlearning.com/kirkpatricks-training-evaluation-model/
10. Drury, R., Homewood, K., & Randall, S. (2011). Less is more: the potential of qualitative approaches in conservation research. Animal Conservation, 14(1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00375.x
11. Eddy, S. L., Converse, M., &Wenderoth, M. P. (2015). A Classroom Observation Tool Assessing Evidence-Based Teaching Practices for Active Learning in Large Science, Technology, Engineering, And Mathematics Classes. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 14(2), p.23. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-06-0095
12. Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R. J., Bruns, P. J., Chang, A., DeHaan, R. L., Gentile, J. R., Miller, S., Stewart, J., Tilghman, S. M., & Wood, W. B. (2004b). Scientific teaching. Science, 304(5670), 521–522. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1096022
13. Kamel, A. M. (2016). Role of faculty development programs in improving teaching and learning. Saudi Journal of Oral Sciences, 3(2), 61. https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-6816.188073
14. M. S., & Srijohn, A. A. (2021). Student counselling and academic performance of the university students in Bangladesh. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3897016
15. Mahmuda, M. (2017). Education Policy 2010 Ministry of Education Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. https://www.academia.edu/33317386/Education_Policy_2010_Ministry_of_Education_Government_of_the_Peoples_Republic_of_Bangladesh
16. Ortlieb, E. T., Biddix, J. P., & Doepker, G. M. (2010). A collaborative approach to higher education induction. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(2), 109-118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787410365655
17. Parks, S. D., & Guenther, L. (2011). Course Redesign in Higher Education: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 3(2), 124-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10027-z
18. Raffaghelli, J. E., & Stewart, B. (2020). Centering complexity in ‘educators’ data literacy’ to support future practices in faculty development: a systematic review of the literature. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1696301
19. Rahman, M. H. A. (2023). Faculty development programs (FDP) in developing professional efficacy: A comparative study among participants and non-participants of FDP in Bangladesh. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), 100499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100499
20. Raja, M. a. S., & Mynavathi, L. (2018). Faculty Development Program Model: A Strategic insight. International Journal of Management Studies, V (3(4)), 98. https://doi.org/10.18843/ijms/v5i3(4)/11
21. Sarker, M. F. H., Islam, K., Islam, M. S., Alam, M. M., Mohiuddin, K., Hoque,
22. Sileyew, K. J. (2020). Research design and methodology. In IntechOpen eBooks. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85731
23. Steinert, Y. (2019). Faculty development: From rubies to oak. Medical Teacher, 42(4), 429–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2019.1688769
24. Vidyakar, V. (2021). Tips to faculty development programs for mechanical students. https://www.skyfilabs.com/blog/how-to-conduct-a-faculty-development-program-in-mechanical-engineering
25. Welch, M. & Plaxton-Moore, S. (2017). Faculty Development for Advancing Community Engagement in Higher Education: Current trends and future directions. https://openjournals.libs.uga.edu/jheoe/article/view/1333
26. Yılmaz, Y., Çalişkan, S., Darcan, Ş., & Darendelıler, F. (2021). Flipped learning in faculty development programs: opportunities for greater faculty engagement, self-learning, collaboration and discussion. Türk Biyokimya Dergisi, 47(1), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1515/tjb-2021-0071
2. Alsalamah, A., & Callinan, C. (2021). Adaptation of Kirkpatrick's four-level Model of Training Criteria to Evaluate Training Programmes for Head Teachers. ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1290265.pdf
3. Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is Qualitative in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7
4. Bhat, A. (2023). Research Design: What it is, Elements & Types. QuestionPro. https://www.questionpro.com/blog/research-design/
5. Bilal, B., & Chen, S. (2019). The impact and effectiveness of faculty development program in fostering the faculty’s knowledge, skills, and professional competence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 26(4), 688–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.10.024
6. Blašková, M., Blaško, R., Figurska, I., & Sokół, A. (2015). Motivation and development of the university teachers’ motivational competence. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.746
7. Buckley H. (2020). Faculty development in the COVID-19 pandemic: so close - yet so far. Med Educ. 2020;20. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14250
8. Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2016). Student Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9
9. DeBell, A. (2023). What is Kirkpatrick’s Training Evaluation Model? Water Bear Learning. https://waterbearlearning.com/kirkpatricks-training-evaluation-model/
10. Drury, R., Homewood, K., & Randall, S. (2011). Less is more: the potential of qualitative approaches in conservation research. Animal Conservation, 14(1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00375.x
11. Eddy, S. L., Converse, M., &Wenderoth, M. P. (2015). A Classroom Observation Tool Assessing Evidence-Based Teaching Practices for Active Learning in Large Science, Technology, Engineering, And Mathematics Classes. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 14(2), p.23. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-06-0095
12. Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R. J., Bruns, P. J., Chang, A., DeHaan, R. L., Gentile, J. R., Miller, S., Stewart, J., Tilghman, S. M., & Wood, W. B. (2004b). Scientific teaching. Science, 304(5670), 521–522. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1096022
13. Kamel, A. M. (2016). Role of faculty development programs in improving teaching and learning. Saudi Journal of Oral Sciences, 3(2), 61. https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-6816.188073
14. M. S., & Srijohn, A. A. (2021). Student counselling and academic performance of the university students in Bangladesh. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3897016
15. Mahmuda, M. (2017). Education Policy 2010 Ministry of Education Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. https://www.academia.edu/33317386/Education_Policy_2010_Ministry_of_Education_Government_of_the_Peoples_Republic_of_Bangladesh
16. Ortlieb, E. T., Biddix, J. P., & Doepker, G. M. (2010). A collaborative approach to higher education induction. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(2), 109-118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787410365655
17. Parks, S. D., & Guenther, L. (2011). Course Redesign in Higher Education: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 3(2), 124-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10027-z
18. Raffaghelli, J. E., & Stewart, B. (2020). Centering complexity in ‘educators’ data literacy’ to support future practices in faculty development: a systematic review of the literature. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1696301
19. Rahman, M. H. A. (2023). Faculty development programs (FDP) in developing professional efficacy: A comparative study among participants and non-participants of FDP in Bangladesh. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), 100499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100499
20. Raja, M. a. S., & Mynavathi, L. (2018). Faculty Development Program Model: A Strategic insight. International Journal of Management Studies, V (3(4)), 98. https://doi.org/10.18843/ijms/v5i3(4)/11
21. Sarker, M. F. H., Islam, K., Islam, M. S., Alam, M. M., Mohiuddin, K., Hoque,
22. Sileyew, K. J. (2020). Research design and methodology. In IntechOpen eBooks. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85731
23. Steinert, Y. (2019). Faculty development: From rubies to oak. Medical Teacher, 42(4), 429–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2019.1688769
24. Vidyakar, V. (2021). Tips to faculty development programs for mechanical students. https://www.skyfilabs.com/blog/how-to-conduct-a-faculty-development-program-in-mechanical-engineering
25. Welch, M. & Plaxton-Moore, S. (2017). Faculty Development for Advancing Community Engagement in Higher Education: Current trends and future directions. https://openjournals.libs.uga.edu/jheoe/article/view/1333
26. Yılmaz, Y., Çalişkan, S., Darcan, Ş., & Darendelıler, F. (2021). Flipped learning in faculty development programs: opportunities for greater faculty engagement, self-learning, collaboration and discussion. Türk Biyokimya Dergisi, 47(1), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1515/tjb-2021-0071
Authors
Md. Rayeed Uddin Siddiqui
Sumain Al Mahmud
[1]
“Assessing the Impact of Faculty Development Programs (FDPs) in Bangladesh: A Case Study on Bangladesh University of Professionals (BUP)”, Soc. sci. humanities j., vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 6014–6026, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.18535/sshj.v8i12.1494.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.