Soft Power in Action: How Foreign Aid Shapes Global Perceptions and Influences International Relations
Abstract
Soft power and foreign aid alter worldwide perceptions and international relations, according to our study. Soft power, according to Joseph Nye, is a nation's ability to achieve its goals by persuasion rather than force or money. Foreign aid boosts donor nations' global image, diplomatic relations, and culture, according to this study. Effective overseas help can transform donor nations' views, it claims. State aid can build goodwill, confidence, and dependencies that promote recipient countries' goals. Case studies suggest that foreign aid boosts soft power in the US and China. This study examines how foreign aid boosts soft power. It promotes worldwide public diplomacy to achieve national interests. The donor nation's legitimacy and morality affect these methods' efficacy. Altruistic global humanitarian aid boosts soft power, but self-interested or conditional aid may damage it. This study addresses soft power foreign aid limits. It persuades, but its effects are indirect and incremental, making instant results difficult to judge. Authoritarian regimes effect international relations. These countries may weaken soft power via disinformation or propaganda. This research shows how complex foreign aid is as a soft power tactic in modern geopolitics. It examines how help affects global perceptions and international relations to show how governments might use aid to gain power in a changing world. For lasting relationships and diplomatic aims, states using soft power through overseas aid must promote sincere involvement and cultural exchange. This research enhances soft power and international development discourse, allowing nations to influence the world using foreign aid.
References
2. 2023b. Total value of import and export commodities by country (region) in June 2023 (USD) [Online]. General Administration of Customs of the People’s Republic of China Available: http://www.customs.gov.cn/customs/302249/zfxxgk/2799825/302274/302277/302276/5157413/index.html [Accessed 18 April 2024 2024].
3. ALLISON CARNEGIE, N. M. 2017. Foreign Aid, Human Rights, and Democracy Promotion: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 61(3), 671-683.
4. AXEL DREHER, P. N., RAINER THIELE 2008. Does US aid buy UN general assembly votes? A disaggregated analysis. Public Choice, 139-164.
5. CHAS, C. 2023. Hans J. Morgenthau’s Critique of Legal Positivism: Politics, Justice, and Ethics in International Law. Jus Cogens, 5, 59-84.
6. DAHL, R. A. 1957. The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2, 201-215.
7. EUNJI KIM, S. L. 2023. Can foreign aid improve the donor country's image among a third-party country's public? The case of a world heritage site restoration project. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 24, 153-167.
8. FRIEDEN, J. 2020. The Political Economy of Economic Policy [Online]. The International Monetary Fund (IMF). Available: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/fandd/issues/2020/06/political-economy-of-economic-policy-jeff-frieden [Accessed 18 May 2024 2024].
9. GAFURI, A. 2022. Can democracy aid improve democracy? The European Union’s democracy assistance 2002–2018. DEMOCRATIZATION, 29, No.5, 777-797.
10. GALLAROTTI, G. M. 2010a. Cosmopolitan Power in International Relations, Cambridge University Press & Assessment.
11. GALLAROTTI, G. M. 2010b. Cosmopolitan Power in International Relations: A Synthesis of Realism, Neoliberalism, and Constructivism, Cambridge University Press.
12. GRAMSCI, A. 1988. Gramsci's prison letters London, Zwan.
13. III, E. J. W. 2008. Hard Power, Soft Power, Smart Power. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, 110-124.
14. ILYANA KUZIEMKO, E. W. 2006. How Much Is a Seat on the Security Council Worth? Foreign Aid and Bribery at the United Nations. The University of Chicago Press Journal, 114, Number 5 (October 2006), 905-930.
15. JERVIS, R. 1997. System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life, Princeton University Press.
16. JOSEPH S. NYE, J. 1990. Soft Power. Foreign Policy, No. 80, Twentieth Anniversary (Autumn, 1990), 153–171.
17. KHANNA, P. 2019. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences, Springer Singapore.
18. LANCASTER, C. 2000. Redesigning Foreign Aid. Foreign Affairs, 79 No.5 (Sep. - Oct. 2000), 74-88.
19. LIU, X. 15 November 2018 2018. What Sharp Power? It’s Nothing But “Unsmart” Power. The CPD Blog [Online]. Available from: https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/what-sharp-power-it%E2%80%99s-nothing-%E2%80%9Cunsmart%E2%80%9D-power.
20. LUKES, S. 2005. Power a radical view, Palgrave Macmillan.
21. MURATBEKOVA, A. 2023. Central Asia in China’s Foreign Policy: Xi’an Summit [Online]. EURASIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE (ERI) Available: https://www.eurasian-research.org/publication/central-asia-in-chinas-foreign-policy-xian-summit/ [Accessed 19 March 2024 2024].
22. NYE, J. S. 2004. Soft power The means to success in world politics, U.S.A., Public Affairs.
23. NYE, J. S. 2018. How Sharp Power Threatens Soft Power [Online]. Foreign Affairs. Available: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2018-01-24/how-sharp-power-threatens-soft-power [Accessed 5 June 2024].
24. OFITSEROV-BELSKIY, D. V. 2024. Instrumental Factors of Soft Power in an Era of Global Turbulence. Russia in Global Affairs, No. 2 2024 April/June, 179–195.
25. OHNESORGE, H. W. 2021. Soft Power: The Forces of Attraction in International Relations.
26. PHILIP A. ATITIANTI, S. K. A. 2023. Aid and Governance: Impact of Chinese Aid on the Evaluation of Government Performance in Sub-Saharan Africa. Africa Spectrum, 58.
27. PHILIP AKROFI ATITIANTI, S. K. A. 15 May 2023 2023. Foreign aid has disintegrated the relationship between the state and its citizens. Available from: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/africaatlse/2023/05/15/foreign-aid-has-disintegrated-the-relationship-between-the-state-and-its-citizens/ 2024].
28. PINKER, S. 2011. The Better Angels of our Nature : Why violence has declined, New York, Viking.
29. RACHEL M. GISSELQUIST, M. N.-Z., AND MELISSA SAMARIN 2021. Does aid support democracy? : The United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research.
30. ROONGSANGJUN, T. 2023. Soft Power and the Development of Thai Society. Journal of Social Work and Social Administration, Vol. 31 No. 1 (2023): January-June 2023, 89-117.
31. SZENT-IVÁNYI, B. 2015. ARE DEMOCRATISING COUNTRIES REWARDED WITH HIGHER LEVELS OF FOREIGN AID? Acta Oeconomica, 65(4), 593–615.
32. TOBIAS HEINRICH, M. W. L. 2019. Democracy Aid and Electoral Accountability. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 63, 139–166.
33. WALSH, C. 2021. Solving racial disparities in policing [Online]. Harvard University. Available: https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2021/02/solving-racial-disparities-in-policing/ [Accessed 30 May 2024].
34. YU BAI, Y. L., YUNUO WANG 2022. Chinese aid and local political attitudes. Economic Modelling, 113.
35. ZOGG, B. 2019. Cooperation, Co-existence or Clash? China and Russia’s Ambitions in Central Asia [Online]. The Diplomat.Available: https://thediplomat.com/2019/11/cooperation-co-existence-or-clash-china-and-russias-ambitions-in-central-asia/ [Accessed 5 March 2024].
Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.