Cultural Shifts and Policy: How Government Actions Shape Social Behavior
Abstract
Shaping social behavior through public policy is a basic yet complex process, necessitating a delicate balance between government intervention, societal norms, and individual rights. Policies are created to address a wide array of social issues, such as public health and safety, economic inequality, and environmental sustainability, in an attempt to influence societal behavior for the greater good. However, most of those policies are usually opposed by resistance to change, unintended consequences, and difficulties in enforcement. This paper examines some of the main challenges to the use of policy in designing social behavior: cultural resistance, policy misalignment with social realities, ethical concerns, and political opposition. In addition, it considers the need to consider long-term impacts on society, ensure resource allocation, and adapt policies to evolving needs. This paper reviews challenges in depth and consequently underlines the complexity of using policy to achieve behavior change; it underscores the need for thoughtful design, public engagement, and ongoing adaptation in the quest for successful outcomes from social policy.
References
2. Berger, N., & Fisher, P. (2013). A well-educated workforce is key to state prosperity. Economic Policy Institute, 22(1), 1-14.
3. Berkman, M. B., & Plutzer, E. (2010). Evolution, Creationism, and the Battle to Control America's Classrooms. Cambridge University Press.
4. Bicchieri, C., Muldoon, R., & Sontuoso, A. (2011). Social norms.
5. Duong Lieu. (2023). Penalty for smoking in public places: 10 years and still difficult. https://tuoitre.vn/xu-phat-hut-thuoc-la-noi-cong-cong-10-nam-van-kho-20231214075358979.htm
6. Eagly, A. H., & Kulesa, P. (1997). Attitudes, attitude structure, and resistance to change. Environmental ethics and behavior, 415, 122-153.
7. Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. University of Chicago Press.
8. Gunningham, N. (2009). Environment law, regulation and governance: Shifting architectures. Journal of Environmental law, 21(2), 179-212.
9. Gunningham, N., & Rees, J. (1997). Industry self‐regulation: an institutional perspective. Law & policy, 19(4), 363-414.
10. Harvard Kennedy School (2014). Nudging for Policy Success: Behavioral Insights in Action.
11. HHS. (2023). New HHS Report Shows National Uninsured Rate Reached All-Time Low in 2023 After Record-Breaking ACA Enrollment Period.
12. Inglehart, R. (2020). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton university press.
13. Jacobs, A. M. (2011). Governing for the long term: Democracy and the politics of investment. Cambridge University Press.
14. Jen Christensen. (2023). US cigarette smoking rate falls to historic low, but e-cigarette use keeps climbing, https://edition.cnn.com/2023/04/27/health/cigarette-smoking-decline/index.html
15. Kettl, D. F. (2000). The transformation of governance: Globalization, devolution, and the role of government. Public administration review, 60(6), 488-497.
16. Lochner, L. (2020). Education and crime. In The economics of education (pp. 109-117). Academic Press.
17. Mettler, S. (2011). "Rediscovering the Submerged State: The Challenge of Invisible Government Policies." Perspectives on Politics, 9(3), 803–816.
18. Mitra, D. (2011). The social and economic benefits of public education. Pennsylvania State University, 3.
19. National Cancer Policy Forum; Board on Health Care Services; Institute of Medicine (2013). SUCCESSFUL STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT ANTISMOKING EFFORTS. Reducing Tobacco-Related Cancer Incidence and Mortality: Workshop Summary. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK206882/
20. OECD (2021). Behavioural Insights and Public Policy: Lessons from Around the World. OECD Publishing.
21. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
22. Roots, R. I. (2004). When laws backfire: Unintended consequences of public policy. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(11), 1376-1394.
23. Schram, S. F., & Caterino, B. (Eds.). (2006). Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research, and Method. NYU Press.
24. Shokef, E., & Erez, M. (2006). Global work culture and global identity, as a platform for a shared understanding in multicultural teams. In National culture and groups (Vol. 9, pp. 325-352). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
25. Smith, K. B., & Larimer, C. (2018). The public policy theory primer. Routledge.
26. Sunstein, C. R. (2013). "Behavioral Economics, Consumption, and Environmental Protection." Environmental Law Reporter.
27. Sunstein, C. R. (2016). The ethics of influence: Government in the age of behavioral science. Cambridge University Press.
28. Tummers, L. (2019). Public policy and behavior change. Public Administration Review, 79(6), 925-930.
29. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Penguin Books.
30. Varnum, M. E., & Grossmann, I. (2017). Cultural change: The how and the why. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 956-972.
31. Vermeule, A. (2004). The constitutional law of congressional procedure. The University of Chicago Law Review, 71(2), 361-437.
32. World Bank (2015). World Development Report: Mind, Society, and Behavior.
33. World Health Organization (WHO). (2013). WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic.
34. Yee, A. S. (1996). The causal effects of ideas on policies. International organization, 50(1), 69-108.
Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.