Examining Community Development Approaches For Rural Development: A Case Study Of Milenge Road Network In Luapula Province.

Maimbo Hamweemba (1) , Dr Kelvin Chibomba (2)
(1) Information And Communications University. , Zambia
(2) Information And Communications University. , Kenya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18535/sshj.v9i02.1685

##plugins.themes.novelty.article.sidebar##

Issue
Vol. 9 No. 02 (2025)
Published
2025-02-26
Keywords:
    Community Participation, Milenge District ,Road Infrastructure, Rural Development,Sustainable Development. Community Participation, Milenge District, Road Infrastructure, Rural Development, Sustainable
PDF

Abstract

Rural development remains central to Zambia's national agenda, with infrastructure development playing a vital role in improving socio-economic conditions. This study examines community development approaches for rural development, using Milenge Road network as a case study in Luapula Province. The study aims to establish the current state of the Milenge Road network, to identify the community development approaches that have been implemented in road improvement initiatives, and to determine challenges associated with community-driven development in rural infrastructure projects. Methodologically, the research adopts a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative and qualitative data collection techniques. It integrates surveys, interviews with structured questionnaires, and field observations to gather diverse insights from residents, community leaders, and stakeholders. This comprehensive methodology ensures a well-rounded understanding of the effects of community-driven road infrastructure projects. The respondents’ results rated the condition of the road very poor at 32%, with 24% using bicycles and 20.33% using public transport as the mode of transportation. When asked if improving the Milenge road network would significantly enhance their quality of life, majority (52%) strongly agreed to the statement.  The study suggests that enhancing community participation can significantly improve the effectiveness and sustainability of rural infrastructure development. The recommendations in addressing this issue is to implement a structured, ongoing maintenance plan that ensures that road remain functional year-round. Addressing systematic challenges such as political interference and corruption is equally important for ensuring the success of road development. These insights are valuable for policymakers, development practitioners, and local communities, providing a foundation for scaling successful strategies and informing inclusive, sustainable rural development policies in Zambia.

References

1. Alam, M. A., Khan, M. A. & Rahman, M. S. (2022). Climate Change and Sustainability. Springer Nature.
2. Brycesson, D. F., Bradbury, A. & Bradbury, R. (2008) 'Disappearing peasantries? Rural labour redundancy in the Neo-Liberal era: a case study from Tanzania', Journal of Peasant Studies, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 271-298.
3. Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
4. Central Statistical Office (CSO). (2020): Population and Demographic Projections Report. Referenced for population statistics of Zambia.
5. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons
6. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th Ed.). SAGE Publications.
7. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017): Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Used for the mixed-methods research approach.
8. Cornwall, A. (2008): Unpacking 'Participation': Models, Meanings, and Practices. Referenced for participatory approaches in development.
9. Fan, S. & Chan-Kang, C. (2005) 'Road development, economic growth, and poverty reduction in China', Journal of Development Studies, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 615-636.
10. Gollin, D. & Rogerson, R. (2014) 'Productivity, transport costs and subsistence agriculture', Journal of Development Economics, vol. 107, pp. 38-48.
11. Gwilliam, K., Foster, V., Archondo-Callao, R., Briceno-Garmendia, C., Nogales, A. & Sethi, A. (2008) 'The highways sector in Mexico: a review of progress and opportunities for improvement'. World Bank, Washington, D.C.
12. Hine, J. & Butter, M. (2000) Sustainable Rehabilitation of Rural Infrastructure. Transport Reviews, 20(2), pp. 153-172.
13. International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). (2016): Rural Development Report 2016. Relevant to sustainability discussions in community-driven approaches.
14. Kvale, S. (2007) Doing interviews. Sage Publications.
15. Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2013): Localizing Development: Does Participation Work?. Referenced for participatory development theory and limitations of community-driven approaches.
16. Ministry of National Development Planning (2017): Seventh National Development Plan (7NDP). Critical for the contextual framework of Zambia's development goals.
17. Porter, G. (2014) 'Transportation and logistics in developing countries', in Handbook of Transportation, vol. 4, pp. 159-176.
18. Taylor & Frances. Nel, H., (2015). An integration of the livelihoods and asset-based community development approaches: A South African case study. Development Southern Africa, 32(4):511-525.
19. World Bank (2018): Zambia Economic Brief: Raising Revenue for Economic Recovery. Relevant for economic and poverty context in Zambia.
20. World Bank (2020): Global Rural Accessibility Index. Relevant to road infrastructure challenges and access.

Authors

Maimbo Hamweemba
Information And Communications University.
Dr Kelvin Chibomba
Information And Communications University.
[1]
“Examining Community Development Approaches For Rural Development: A Case Study Of Milenge Road Network In Luapula Province”., Soc. sci. humanities j., vol. 9, no. 02, pp. 7064–7075, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.18535/sshj.v9i02.1685.