Mineral Rights and Sustainable Development in the Copper Mining Industry on Zambia: A Case Study of Lumwana and Kansanshi Mines

Dr. Stephen Kambani Pamela Malama Masase

Abstract

Sustainable development from mining activities must recognize the finite nature of minerals and hence the need for the creation of linkages where the benefits from mining continue to be enjoyed long after the natural resources have been depleted. In order to facilitate these linkages, the economic gains from the mining industry should be equitably distributed among all the stakeholders in any project area. Studies show that in Zambia, the economic benefits from the mining projects are not equitably distributed among the stakeholders and that the problem stems from the lack of involvement of all stakeholders in the process of granting mineral exploitation rights to would be investors. So far there is little known about whether indeed there is equitable distribution of economic wealth among stakeholders in the mining projects or whether all the stakeholders are involved in the procedure for granting mineral exploitation rights. The main objective of this research was to evaluate whether the method of granting mineral exploitation rights influences the equitable distribution of economic benefits among the stakeholders from mining projects. A study was carried at Lumwana and Kansanshi Mines of the North-Western Province in Zambia. Specifically the study evaluated: the extent to which the current way of granting mineral exploitation rights affects the equitable distribution of economic benefits among the stakeholders from a mining project; whether a grant of mineral exploitation rights through negotiations by the stakeholders before the commencement of a mining project would be capable of bringing about the equitable distribution of economic benefits from a mining project to all stakeholders; and whether there are other factors which may have impinged on the equitable distribution of economic benefits from the mining projects other than the method of granting mineral exploitation rights. A case study approach was adopted and a qualitative method was employed. The respondents were selected purposively. Six focus group discussions, each consisting of ten respondents were conducted and interview guides were used to collect data from key informants. Data was analysed thematically. The study revealed that the current procedure for granting mineral exploitation does not allow for equitable distribution of economic benefits. The study also revealed that the equitable distribution of economic benefits was achievable through negotiations with all stakeholders before granting mining licences. Furthermore, the study revealed that there are no other factors that affect the equitable distribution of economic benefits. The study concluded by recommending that the procedure for grant of mineral exploitation rights should be revised to include all stakeholders in a negotiation before mining licence is granted. Secondly, that there should be a plan beforehand on how the revenue from mining projects will be expended depending on the needs of all stakeholders involved.

References

AfDB (2007), African Development Report: Natural Resources for Sustainable Development in Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press
AfDB (2016), Zambia Country Profile Document.
Angelakoglou, K., Gaidajis, G (2013), Assessing the progress of mining industry towards sustainability: In need of new methodological frameworks. Sustainable Development in the Minerals Industry Conference, Milos Island.
Azapagic, A (2004), Developing a framework for Sustainable Development indicators for the mining and minerals industry. Journal of Cleaner Production. 12, 639-662
Bell, J (2005), Doing your research project: A guide for first-time researchers in education, health and social science. New York: Open University Press
Blewitt, J (2008), Understanding Sustainable Development. London: Earthscan.
Collier, P (2007), The Bottom Billion: Why the poorest Countries are failing in what can be done. New York: Oxford Press.
Collier, P., Hoefflier, A (2012), High-value natural resources, development and conflict: Channels of causation. In High-value Natural Resource and Peace building. Ed. Lujala, P., Rustad, S.A. London: Earthscan.
Conrad, M (2012), Zambia’s Mineral Fiscal Regime. International Growth Centre. Online. 19th Sept, 2015.
Corden, W. M (1984), Booming Sector and Dutch Disease Economics: Survey and Consolidation. Oxford Economics Papers. 36, 356-380.
Fessehaie, J., Morris, M (2013), Value Chain Dynamics of Chinese Copper Mining in Zambia: Enclave or Linkage Development? European Journal of Development Research. 25, 537-556.
Franks, D, M., Boger, D.V., Cote, C., Mulligan, D (2011), Sustainable development principles for the disposal of mining and mineral processing wastes. Resources Policy, 36, 114-12.
Gilberthorpe, E., Papyrakis, E 2015), The Extractive industries and development: The resource curse at the micro, meso and macro levels. The Extractive Industries and Society, 2, 381-390.
Hernandez, I (2006), The "Dutch Disease": Theory and Evidence, World Bank Institute. (WBIGC).
Hilson, G., Murck, B (2000), Sustainable development in the mining industry: clarifying the corporate perspective. Resources Policy, 20, 227-238.
Joya, O (2015), Growth and Volatility in resource-rich countries: Doe diversification help. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 35, 38-55.
Kogel, J.E., Trivedi, N., Herpfer, M.A (2014), Measuring sustainable development in industrial minerals mining. International Journal in Mining and Mineral Engineering. 5(1.
Kumah, A (2006), Sustainability and gold mining in the developing world. Journal of Cleaner Production. 14, 315-323.
Litvinoff, M (2012), Consultation on IMF Natural Resource Work. London. Publish What You Pay UK.
Manley, D (2013), A Guide to Mining Taxation in Zambia. Lusaka. Institute for Policy Analysis and Research.
Masinja, J and Simukanga (2014), An Extractive Industry Contract Negotiation Model. MINPROC, 2014 Cape Town, South Africa, 7-8 August 2014.
McMahon, G., Moreira, S (2014), The contribution of the Mining Sector to Socioeconomic and Human Development. Extractive Industries for Development.
Mensa, E.N.Y (2016), Extractive Industries Taxation. ESOSOC Special Meeting on International Cooperation in Tax Matters, New York, 9th December, 2016.
Miles, M. B and Huberman, A. M. (2013), Qualitative Data Analysis. California: Sage Production.
Mines and Minerals Act, Chapter 213 of the Laws of Zambia
Mines and Minerals Act, No. 7 of 2008
Mines and Minerals Development Act, No. 11 of 2015
Ndulo, M (1986), Mining Legislation and Mineral Development in Zambia. Cornell Law Faculty Publications. 19(1),1-33.
Olanya, D.R (2015), Will Ugandan succumb to the resource curse?: Critical reflections. The Extractive Industries and Society. 2, 46-55.
Ominiyi, O (2011), Sustainable Development: What Role for Economic Intergration, Trade and Investment Policies. African Journal for Sustainable Development. 1(1),1.
Pereira, L.C.B (2010), Globalisation and Competition: Why some emergent countries succeed while others fall behind. London. Cambridge University Press.
Pereira, L.C.B (2017), How to neutralize the Dutch disease notwithstanding the natural resources curse. Sao Paulo School of Economics. Working paper to presented to the Likhachev Science Conference, St. Petersburg University of Humanities and Social Sciences, St. Petersburg, May 18-20, 2017.
Poncela, P., Senra, E. and Sierra, P (2017), Long-term links between raw materials prices, real exchange rate and relative de-industrialization in a commodity dependent economy. Empirical evidence of “Dutch disease” in Colombia. Empirical Economics. 52, 777-798.
Ramdoo, I (2013), Fixing Broken Links: Linking extractive sectors to productive value chains. European Centre for Development Policy Management.
Sachs, J.D., Warner, A. M (2001), Natural Resources and Economic Development: The Resource Curse. European Economic Review. 45, 827-838.
Simpasa, A., Hailu, D., Levine, S., Tibana, R, J (2013), Capturing Mineral Revenues in Zambia: Past and Future Prospects. New York. EU-UN Global Partnership on Land Natural Resources and conflict.
Swilling, M (2012), Beyond the resource curse: From resource wars to sustainable resource management in Africa. A paper presented at the Winelands Conference on integrity and governance, Stellenbosch, April, 2012.
Swilling, M., Annecke, E (2012), Just Transitions: Explorations of sustainability in an unfair world. Cape Town. UCT Press.
Venables, A.J (2016), Using natural resources for development: Why has it proved so difficult? Journal of Economic Perspectives. 30(1) 161-184.
Vintro, C., Sanmiquel. L. and Freijo, M. (2014). Environmental sustainability in the mining sector: evidence from Catalan companies. Journal of Cleaner Production. 84, 155-163.
World Bank (2011), What would it take for Zambia’s Copper Mining Industry to achieve its potential? Siteresources.worldbank.org/INTZAMBIA/Resources/copper-mining-summary.

Authors

Dr. Stephen Kambani
Pamela Malama Masase
[1]
“Mineral Rights and Sustainable Development in the Copper Mining Industry on Zambia: A Case Study of Lumwana and Kansanshi Mines”, Soc. sci. humanities j., vol. 3, no. 05, pp. 1195–1210, May 2019, Accessed: Nov. 23, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://sshjournal.com/index.php/sshj/article/view/387
Copyright and license info is not available