Abstract

The interest of the younger generation to continue agriculture is a challenge for agricultural development, if there is no generation that continues agricultural business, it will be difficult to achieve sustainability. The Ministry of Agriculture noted that the absorption of agricultural labor tends to decrease. This study aims to explored and analyzed the social capital of generation X, generation Y and generation Z farmers in relation to farmer regeneration. The research was conducted in Sleman Regency, with a qualitative approach. Research informants 24 farmers, ranging from on farm and off farm. Data analysis used Miles and Huberman qualitative with Nvivo 12 analysis software. The results showed that social capital is an important aspect for farmers in running livestock farming businesses. Social capital shapers among generations dominate diversely, gen X is higher the norm, while gen Y and Z network. Gen X is mostly capable of bonding and bridging, but gen Y is the gene most capable of forming linking. Institutions that become a forum for intergenerational collaboration are needed to be able to work together, implementing upstream to downstream agribusiness management. Gen Y as an agent of change changes the mindset of farming is dirty and poor, and shows that the livestock agriculture sector is a prospective sector to increase the interest of the younger generation in agriculture and animal husbandry.

Keywords

  • Substance use
  • substance abuse

References

  1. Andrews, T. (2021). Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice and the OECD PISA Global Competence Framework. Journal of Research in International Education, 20(2), 154–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/14752409211032525
  2. Arnott, D., Chadwick, D. R., Wynne-Jones, S., Dandy, N., & Jones, D. L. (2021). Importance of building bridging and linking social capital in adapting to changes in UK agricultural policy. Journal of Rural Studies, 83(February 2020), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.02.001
  3. Azad, M. J., & Pritchard, B. (2023). Bonding, bridging, linking social capital as mutually reinforcing elements in adaptive capacity development to flood hazard: Insights from rural Bangladesh. Climate Risk Management, 40(February), 100498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2023.100498
  4. Bakker, Y. W., de Koning, J., & van Tatenhove, J. (2019). Resilience and social capital: The engagement of fisheries communities in marine spatial planning. Marine Policy, 99(February 2018), 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.09.032
  5. Bao, H. X. H., Jiang, Y., Wang, Z., & Feng, L. (2024). Social capital and the effectiveness of land use policies: Evidence from rural China. Land Use Policy, 139(January), 107069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107069
  6. Barghusen, R., Sattler, C., Deijl, L., Weebers, C., & Matzdorf, B. (2021). Motivations of farmers to participate in collective agri-environmental schemes: the case of Dutch agricultural collectives. Ecosystems and People, 17(1), 539–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2021.1979098
  7. Bodwitch, H., Polson, M., Biber, E., Hickey, G. M., & Butsic, V. (2021). Why comply? Farmer motivations and barriers in cannabis agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies, 86, 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.05.006
  8. Burton, R. J. F. (2012). Understanding Farmers’ Aesthetic Preference for Tidy Agricultural Landscapes: A Bourdieusian Perspective. Landscape Research, 37(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2011.559311
  9. Caffaro, F., Micheletti Cremasco, M., Roccato, M., & Cavallo, E. (2020). Drivers of farmers’ intention to adopt technological innovations in Italy: The role of information sources, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use. Journal of Rural Studies, 76(July 2019), 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.04.028
  10. CofrΓ©-bravo, G., Klerkx, L., & Engler, A. (2019). Combinations of bonding , bridging , and linking social capital for farm innovation : How farmers con fi gure di ff erent support networks. 69(July 2018), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.04.004
  11. CofrΓ©-Bravo, G., Klerkx, L., & Engler, A. (2019). Combinations of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital for farm innovation: How farmers configure different support networks. Journal of Rural Studies, 69(July 2018), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.04.004
  12. Costa, C., Burke, C., & Murphy, M. (2019). Capturing habitus: theory, method and reflexivity. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 42(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.1420771
  13. Dickens, P. (2012). Cosmology and society: Developing a Bourdieusian perspective. In Sociological Research Online (Vol. 17, Issue 2, pp. 1–13). https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2613
  14. Dolinska, A. (2021). Farmers as agents in innovation systems . Empowering farmers for innovation through communities of practice Farmers as agents in innovation systems . Empowering farmers for innovation through communities of practice. AGSY, 142(December), 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.11.009
  15. Fleming, A., O’Grady, A. P., Mendham, D., England, J., Mitchell, P., Moroni, M., & Lyons, A. (2019). Understanding the values behind farmer perceptions of trees on farms to increase adoption of agroforestry in Australia. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-019-0555-5
  16. Husu, H. M. (2022). Rethinking incumbency: Utilising Bourdieu’s field, capital, and habitus to explain energy transitions. Energy Research and Social Science, 93(August), 102825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102825
  17. Ilyas, I. (2022). Optimalisasi peran petani milenial dan digitalisasi pertanian dalam pengembangan pertanian di Indonesia. Forum Ekonomi, 24(2), 259–266. https://doi.org/10.30872/jfor.v24i2.10364
  18. Mardiyanti, E., Gunawan, G., & Hafizh, R. (2023). Persepsi Generasi Z Terhadap Profesi Petani (Studi Kasus Mahasiswa Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa). Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Tirtayasa, 5(2), 383–390. https://doi.org/10.33512/jipt.v5i2.23152
  19. Md Rami, A. A., Zaremohzzabieh, Z., Aziz, F., Ismail, I. A., & Abdullah, H. (2022). Moderating Role of Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivations in the Relationship between Community Leadership and Social Capital in Rural Malaysia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416375
  20. Mellon-Bedi, S., Descheemaeker, K., Hundie-Kotu, B., Frimpong, S., & Groot, J. C. J. (2020). Motivational factors influencing farming practices in northern Ghana. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 92(February), 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2020.100326
  21. Meriac, J. P., Woehr, D. J., & Banister, C. (2010). Generational differences in work ethic: An examination of measurement equivalence across three cohorts. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9164-7
  22. Muwafi, D., & Fareh, S. (2021). Translation as a social activity: Towards a bourdieusian understanding of pickthall’s translation of the quran. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 21(2), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.33806/IJAES2000.21.2.4
  23. Nawawi, F. A., Zela, ;, Alfira2, N., Anti, ;, & Anneja, S. (2022). Faktor Penyebab Ketidaktertarikan Generasi Muda Pada Sektor Pertanian Serta Penanganannya. Universitas Negeri Surabaya 2022 |, 585, 585–593. www.bps.go.id
  24. Nugroho, T. W., Hanani, N., Toiba, H., & Sujarwo, S. (2022). Does Social Capital Improve Food Security? Evidence From the Indonesian Family Life Survey. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 12(2), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.55493/5005.v12i2.4502
  25. Pu, M., & Zhong, Y. (2020). Rising concerns over agricultural production as COVID-19 spreads : Lessons from China. Global Food Security, 26(July), 100409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100409
  26. Rahimi-Feyzabad, F., Yazdanpanah, M., Burton, R. J. F., Forouzani, M., & Mohammadzadeh, S. (2020). The use of a bourdieusian β€œcapitals” model for understanding farmer’s irrigation behavior in Iran. Journal of Hydrology, 591(April), 125442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125442
  27. Ruswendi, Sastro, Y., Ishak, A., & Hutapea, N. (2020). Kajian Karakteristik Petani Milenial di Provinsi Bengkulu. Buletin AGRITEK, 1(2), 47–58.
  28. Sakdapolrak, P. (2014). Livelihoods as social practices - re-energising livelihoods research with bourdieu’s theory of practice. Geographica Helvetica, 69(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-69-19-2014
  29. Salman, D., Kasim, K., Ahmad, A., & Sirimorok, N. (2021). Combination of bonding, bridging and linking social capital in a livelihood system: Nomadic duck herders amid the covid-19 pandemic in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Forest and Society, 5(1), 136–158. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v5i1.11813
  30. Seufert, V., Austin, S. E., Badami, M. G., Turner, S., & Ramankutty, N. (2023). The diversity of organic farmer motivations and livelihoods in the Global South – A case study in Kerala, India. Geoforum, 138(February 2021), 103670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.103670
  31. Termeer, E. E. W., Soma, K., Motovska, N., Ayuya, O. I., Kunz, M., & Koster, T. (2022). Sustainable Development Ensued by Social Capital Impacts on Food Insecurity: The Case of Kibera, Nairobi. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095504
  32. Tolinggi, W. K., Salman, D., Rahmadanih, & Iswoyo, H. (2023). Farmer regeneration and knowledge co-creation in the sustainability of coconut agribusiness in Gorontalo, Indonesia. Open Agriculture, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2022-0162
  33. Waterfield, J. (2015). Using bourdieu’s theoretical framework to examine how the pharmacy educator views pharmacy knowledge. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(10), 153. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7910153
  34. Widayanti, S., Ratnasari, S., Mubarokah, M., & Atasa, D. (2021). Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Minat Generasi Milineal Untuk Melanjutkan Usahatani Keluarga Di Kecamatan Mejayan, Kabupaten Madiun. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 20(2), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.20.2.279-288
  35. Wulandhari, N. B. I., GΓΆlgeci, I., Mishra, N., Sivarajah, U., & Gupta, S. (2022). Exploring the role of social capital mechanisms in cooperative resilience. Journal of Business Research, 143(March 2021), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.026
  36. Yamin, M., Lifianthi, L., & Ayuningsih, D. F. (2023). Analisis Minat Anak Petani Padi menjadi Petani di Desa Pasemah Air Keruh Sumatera Selatan. Jurnal Ilmiah Membangun Desa Dan Pertanian, 8(2), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.37149/jimdp.v8i2.206